Search

4,359 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 17 of 218

1. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · September 10, 1991 · in the opinion

   Hagen v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

   …when it sold its Kaylo division to Owens-Corning Fiberglass. It has not manufactured or distributed any product containing asbestos since then. The parties stipulated that Owens-Illinois was not liable for exposure to Kaylo occurring…

2. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003 · in the opinion

   Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2003)

   …Co., J.P. Bushnell Packing & Supply, Luse-Stevenson Co., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., North American Refractories, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Pittsburgh Corning Corp., Paul J. Krez Co., PPG Industries, Rapid American Corp., Swindell Dressler International Co.…

3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · October 7, 1983 · in the opinion

   Hobby v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

   …plaintiff. Howard Boman, East St. Louis, Ill., for Johns-Manville Sales. Al J. Pranaitis, Alton, Ill., for Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. John C. Shepherd, Belleville, Ill., for Flintkote Co. C. Patout Ducey, Ducey, Feder & Ducey, Belleville…

4. Court case · Colorado Supreme Court · September 16, 1991 · in the opinion

   Miller v. Armstrong World Industries (1991)

   …Delaware Corporation), National Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation (Successor to Keasby & Mattison Corp., a Delaware Corporation), Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (Successor to Unarco Industries, Inc.), Raymark Industries, Inc., (Successor to…

5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · August 18, 1988 · in the opinion

   Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

   …defendants' motion for judgment is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. \[1\] Johns-Manville Corporation and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation. Plaintiff did not name Johns-Manville because it had filed for bankruptcy status. \[2\] Contra Abel v…

6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · October 29, 2008 · in the opinion

   Dukes v. Pneumo Abex Corporations (2008)

   …the deposition is sought to be admitted were protected by the presence of a party at the deposition with the opportunity and a similar motive to develop testimony." McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 298 Ill…

7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 16, 2007 · in the opinion

   Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation (2007)

   …all damages, economic and noneconomic. Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1197-1198 (Arena) held that Proposition 51 applies to strict liability asbestos cases under certain circumstances. Wilson v. John Crane…

8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020 · in the opinion

   Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)

   …cases, Louisiana juries awarded lesser sums for pain and suffering even in light of evidence that the plaintiff's suffering was a "ten out of ten," Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2003-0248 (La. App…

9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · December 22, 2014 · in the opinion

   Krik v. Crane Co. (2014)

   …Inc., 357 Ill.Dec. 73, 962 N.E.2d 974 (Ill.App.Ct.2011), and Johnson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 313 Ill.App.3d 230, 246 Ill.Dec. 232, 729 N.E.2d 883 (2000)…

10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 29, 2003 · in the opinion

    Caruso v. M & O Insulation Co. (2003)

    …ACandS, 340 Md. at 366, 667 A.2d at 131. Owens-Corning did not stop manufacturing asbestos-containing Kaylo until 1972. McClure [\332] v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill.2d 102, 116, 241 Ill.Dec…

11. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · September 13, 1995 · in the opinion

    Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp. (1995)

    …America. Davis & Young Co., L.P.A., and Martin J. Murphy, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation. Ronald G. Rossetti, Jr., urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys. Vorys…

12. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion

    Vince v. Crane Co. (2007)

    …to the defendant's asbestos; "(4) Any factors that mitigated or enhanced the plaintiff's exposure to asbestos. \[4\] We take issue with the estate's citation to Gates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (Dec. 3…

13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · May 24, 1983 · in the opinion

    Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp. (1983)

    …Inc.; Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 26 B.R. 644 (E.D.Wis.1983). The careful balancing of interests mandated by the Supreme Court in Landis requires that the stays granted in the instant cases…

14. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 11, 1994 · in the opinion

    DiDio v. Philadelphia Asbestos Corp. (1994)

    …A.2d 919 (1993). Secondly, regarding the severance of Owens-Illinois' crossclaims against settling defendants, I observe that the procedural mechanism of severance distinguishes this case from Deptula v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Company, 425 Pa.Super…

15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · September 10, 1973 · in the opinion

    Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation (1973)

    …1590. The Act gives the Secretary of Labor the authority to establish standards for permissible concentrations of airborne asbestos fibers. \[17\] The original complaint also named as defendants Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Standard Asbestos Manufacturing and…

16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 1982 · in the opinion

    Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    …Insulating, UNARCO Industries, Nicolette, and Celotex. Six of the present appellants were parties to Borel: Pittsburgh Corning, Armstrong Cork, Phillip Carey, Ruberoid, Johns-Manville, and Fibreboard Paper. Owens Corning Fiberglass, Standard Asbestos Mfg. & Insulating, UNARCO, and…

17. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 31, 2012 · in the opinion

    Menssen v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2012)

    …of two or more persons for the purpose of accomplishing by concerted action either an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill…

18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 2, 2016 · in the opinion

    Weis v. Dsm Copolymer, Inc. (2016)

    …is improper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(2). See Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F.Supp.2d 653, 670 (E.D.Tex.1999). Accordingly, the court will focus its analysis of…

19. Company document · 1969 · Objections to dismissal of Owens-Corning and Standard Asbestos · page 2

    The Borel v. Fibreboard case file (1969-1972)

    In the document: An interlocutory judgment has that Owens-Corning Fiberglas dismissed and the as from this cause Corporation should both as Court decreeing be to plaintiff's in all things cause of action asserted by National Surety intervener…

20. Company document · 1967

    O. W. Pfeifer to R. F. Shannon, Asbestos: Amosite and Chrysotile (1967)

    An Owens-Corning Fiberglas study sent by O. W. Pfeifer to R. F. Shannon at Granville on May 16, 1967, gathering basic information on amosite and chrysotile asbestos, starting with the grades of amosite bought from…