34 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 20, 2015
Oddo v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2015)
…affirmed Ford's liability, reallocated fault to Ford 65%, Union Carbide 25% and Higgins 10%, and amended the survival damages award against Ford, so the plaintiffs lost against Southern Talc but kept their judgment against Ford…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 25, 2014 · in the opinion
Lovelace v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2014)
Ford Motor Company During Trial Abex contends the judgment must be reversed "based on the \[trial\] court's prejudicial decision to apply Campbell mid-trial." Abex characterizes "the publication of Campbell" as "\[a\]n unexpected event…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion
Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)
…and a reasonable person would conclude that the utility of the product did not outweigh the risk inherent in marketing a product designed in that manner." Denny v. Ford Motor Company, 87 N.Y.2d 248…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2013)
…63; Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 262-263.) Strict liability is justified as a means to spread the costs of injuries resulting from dangerous and defective products among the products' manufacturers…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion
Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)
…the then-leading case on whether defendants owed a duty of care to prevent take-home or secondary asbestos exposure under California law, Campbell v. Ford Motor Co. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 15. (4 Cetrulo…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 10, 1985 · in the opinion
Kaminski v. Western MacArthur Co. (1985)
…v. IRM Corporation (1985) 38 Cal.3d 454 \[213 Cal. Rptr. 213, 698 P.2d 116\]; Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256 \[37 Cal. Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168\]; Barth v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · February 17, 1987 · in the opinion
Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)
…and alternative liability in Marshall v. Celotex, 651 F.Supp. 389 (E.D.Mich.1987). \[2\] Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 33, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985) ("\[P\]laintiff is entitled…
-
Trade catalog or brochure · 1920 · page 102
Johns-Manville Service to Power Users: Catalog No. 117, Second Edition (1920)
In the document: …Ky. Peerless Motor Car Co. Cleveland, Ohio. Pullman Company, Pullman, Ill. Willard Storage Battery Co., Cleveland, Ohio New England States Bath Iron Works, Ltd., Bath, Me. Morley Button Manufacturing Co., Portsmouth, N. H. Brown Company, Berlin…
-
Company document · JM Knowledge Chronology · March 1974 · page 29
Johns-Manville, A Condensation of Environmental Facts on Asbestos and Health, Customer Seminars (1974)
In the document: …s employees. BULK FIBER HANDLING SYSTEMS One new method of shipping asbestos fiber is the bulk tank car, which was developed by J-M in conjunction with the Ford Motor Co. and Procor in Oakville, Ontario…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion
Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)
…See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) ("permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability") (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · December 9, 1986 · in the opinion
In re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases (1986)
…920(3). This imputed knowledge test is, therefore, clearly not inconsistent with strict products liability. See e.g. Wood v. Ford Motor Co., 71 Or.App. 87, 691 P.2d 495 (1984), rev. den., 298 Or…
-
Company document · WARD Documents · March 27, 1968 · page 6
Johns-Manville Marketing Communication Newsletters (1968)
In the document: …been around J-M for 43 years like one of the better ideas SALES CONTINUE plus' (apologies to Ford Motor Co) their modest climb....For April tally less is designed to keep water can you get…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 15, 1987 · in the opinion
Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc. (1987)
…itself and the consumer's expectations. Davis, at 72. Thus, in Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097, 47 A.L.R.4th 609 (1984), we held that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · March 17, 1986 · in the opinion
In re Moorenovich (1986)
…not recover damages for negligently inflicted mental suffering, except in connection with recovery of damages for physical injury caused by the same negligent act." Vicnire v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 401 A.2d 148, 153 (1979)…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 4, 1991 · in the opinion
Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc. (1991)
…483, 744 P.2d 357 (1987), review denied, 110 Wn.2d 1007 (1988). See also Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 209, 683 P.2d 1097, 40 A.L.R.4th 609, (1984…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · March 27, 1989 · in the opinion
Dube v. Pittsburgh Corning (1989)
…768 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir.1985) (same); Ford v. American Motors Corp., 770 F.2d 465 (5th Cir.1985) (decision of postal service not to warn buyers of surplus vehicles of risk of rollovers was…
-
Company document · WARD Documents · March 1974 · page 33
Johns-Manville, Asbestos and Health: A Special Report (1974)
In the document: Each of the six bulk tank cars now supplying Ford holds 535 tons of the fiber. The car is loaded at the mine by pumping fiber into the seven compartments, At the receiving location, air is…
-
Trade catalog or brochure · 1923 · page 215
Johns-Manville Service to Railroads (1923)
In the document: …plant where other floorings have not given proper service? It will af ford an opportunity to make a personal test of Industrial Flooring where you can convince yourself by actual use. Let us know your conditions…
-
Company document · JM Knowledge Chronology · October 21, 1936 · page 3
Vandiver Brown to S. A. Williams on Accepting the Illinois Occupational Diseases Act (1936)
In the document: …and in the case of McCreery vs. Libbey-Owens-Ford. Neither is there any chance that such employees could bring an action under Section 2 of the old Occupational Diseases Aot upon the theory that the…
-
Company document · WARD Documents · December 8, 1988 · page 18
Chronology of Publications on Asbestos and Disease, Attorney Work Product List and Draft (1988)
In the document: …2):139-152, April 30 (H#Z2%gS)) G.M, wheatley, Present knowledge of asbestosis-tuberculosis association and analysis of tuberculous mortality in the mining center of Thet ford-les-Mines, Quebec, Canada, Laval medical 12…