590 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 29 of 30
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Hubbard v. California Water Service Company (2018)
…explained in a footnote that it was using the term "landowner" to refer "to either an owner or a possessor of land that owes some kind of duty of care to keep the premises safe." (Kinsman…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 25, 2016 · in the opinion
US v. Silver (2016)
…1905, 1914; GX 700. When Steven Witkoff, who owns eighty-five percent of the Witkoff Group, discovered that Silver was receiving referral fees, he was furious because he believed the arrangement could be illegal. Tr. 2038…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Bostic v. 3M Company (2018)
…statute has "consistently been held to require complete diversity of citizenship. That is, diversity jurisdiction does not exist unless each defendant is a citizen of a different State from each plaintiff." Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 26, 2017 · in the opinion
National Fire Insurance Company OF Hartford v. Burns & Scalo Roofing Company (2017)
…on an analysis of facts and/or evidence. As detailed below, whether an insurer owes a duty to defend an insured, in a litigation brought against the insured, is an issue generally determined by considering the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Godfrey v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. (CPLR …
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 18, 2019 · in the opinion
ALBIN v. AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…using asbestos insulation. WILSON CHALCO: Deceased from Mesothelioma. Exposed from 1971-2006 from work as laborer and maintenance, and from working around others using asbestos containing products. Exposed to asbestos containing ovens, matrix boards, valves, pumps…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Holzworth v. Alfa Laval Inc. (2016)
…nder maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute."), with Quirin v…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2010)
…2d at 248). While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court held that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of asbestos insulation that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · February 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair Inc. (2019)
…GALE, PC. Perrigo Company, Defendant, represented by Ben F. Galloway, III, OWEN & GALLOWAY, PLLC, Jeffrey Jerome Hines, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & DANN, LLP, pro hac vice, Joe Sam Owen, OWEN, GALLOWAY & MYERS, PLLC, Michael A. Pichini, GOODELL…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · February 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2014)
…third parties (often provided years later), and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute. B. Maxim's Motion for Summary Judgment…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)
…cases, the Washington Supreme Court held, in relevant part, that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of an asbestos-containing product that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply. Simonetta…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
…harm. "A person that owns property is negligent if he or she fails to use reasonable care to keep the property in a reasonably safe condition. A person that owns property must use reasonable care to…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · January 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2018)
…R.C. 2307.96(B), the statute provides no definition for the term "substantial factor." This lack of clarity opens the door to inconsistent application of R.C. 2307.96 and gave rise to this appeal. {¶…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Company (2015)
…Chapter 95. Instead, the chapter uses the phrase "property owner," which section 95.001(3) defines to mean "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes." TEX. CIV. PRAC…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Miller v. AO Smith Water Prods. (2019)
…should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 12, 2019 · in the opinion
English v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Fontes v. Interstate Brands Corporation (2011)
…days. As a maintenance man, Mr. Fontes removed and replaced steam line insulation twice a year on two ovens. According to Mr. Fontes, the insulation that was removed from the steam lines consisted of a grayish…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 7, 2012 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2012)
…personal jurisdiction. The Court should consider whether the defendant: engaged in business in this state; is licensed to do business in this state; owns, leases, or controls property (real or personal) or assets in this state;…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · September 3, 2019 · in the opinion
Hinson v. Continental Tire the Americas (2019)
…were layered together and pressed in a tire-building machine..... The "green tires" were then transported to the curing department. There were 147 clam-shell-shaped curing presses/ovens in the curing department..... The curing process…