No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

66 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 3 of 4

  1. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · April 26, 1999 · in the opinion

    Holmes v. ACandS, Inc. (1999)

    …that if the underlying claim is barred, any claim that might have been maintained by the personal representative is also barred." Brief of Appellants at 18. In Grimm v. Ford Motor Co., 157 Mich. App. 633…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of the Virgin Islands · September 27, 1991 · in the opinion

    Dunn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass (1991)

    …See also Tunis Bros. Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 124 F.R.D. 95, 97-98 (E.D.Pa.1989) (failure to list witness justified excluding witness). EVIDENTIARY QUESTIONS Defendant argues that this court erred in…

  3. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 4, 1991 · in the opinion

    Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc. (1991)

    …483, 744 P.2d 357 (1987), review denied, 110 Wn.2d 1007 (1988). See also Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 209, 683 P.2d 1097, 40 A.L.R.4th 609, (1984…

  4. Medical study · Medical research · 1992

    Serum oncoproteins and growth factors in asbestosis and silicosis patients

    This case-referent study drew on patients with compensated asbestosis or silicosis followed at the Institute of Occupational Health in Finland. The authors tested 91 stored serum samples, taken between March 1983 and August 1987, from 46 patients…

  5. Government report · 1995 · page 160

    Toxicological Profile for Asbestos (1995)

    In the document: 139 ASBESTOS 8. REFERENCES Dodson RF, Ford JO. 1991. Tissue reaction following a second exposure to amosite asbestos . Cytobios 68 :53-62. Dodson RF, Hurst GA, Williams MG, et al. 1988. Comparison of light and electron…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 29, 1998 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Owens-Illinois (1998)

    …Special Appeals of Maryland. [\60] Harry Goldman, Jr. (Goldman, Skeen & Wadler, P.A., on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellants. B. Ford Davis, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore, for ACandS, Inc. Edward F. Houff, Church & Houff, P.A.…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 25, 1998 · in the opinion

    Callaway v. Anco Insulation, Inc. (1998)

    …1998. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. [\731] Antonio E. Papale, Jr., Julie DiFulco Robles, Barbara Bourdonnay O'Donnell, Robert D. Ford, Hailey, McNamara, Hall, Larmann & Papale, L.L.P., Metairie, for the Relator. Robert…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 27, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Asner (1995)

    …C. Petersen, Padraic McSherry Morton and Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant, Porter Hayden Co. B. Ford Davis (Dwight W. Stone, II and Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant, ACandS…

  9. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 11, 1999 · in the opinion

    North American Refractory Co. v. Easter (1999)

    …Corp. v. Valdez, 921 S.W.2d 444, 448 (Tex.App.— Corpus Christi 1996, orig. proceeding); Lone Star Ford, Inc. v. McCormick, 838 S.W.2d 734, 737 (Tex.App.—Houston \[1st Dist.\] 1992, writ denied)…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 16, 1993 · in the opinion

    Giffear v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1993)

    …KELLY, POPOVICH, HUDOCK and FORD ELLIOTT, JJ. CIRILLO, Judge. William and Paula Giffear (the Giffears) appeal from an order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict (j.n…

  11. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · March 6, 1997 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Henkel (1997)

    …both Batson, in which the Supreme Court made it clear that a timely objection was required, and Ford, in which that Court described the approach we now adopt as "sensible," were decided before the trial. OCF…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 11, 1998 · in the opinion

    McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …also Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School Dist., 496 Pa. 590, 595, 437 A.2d 1198, 1200 (1981); Ford v. Jeffries, 474 Pa. 588, 591-92, 379 A.2d 111, 112-13 (1977). It is well…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · April 4, 1996 · in the opinion

    Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. (1996)

    …under different circumstances, recovery should be allowed for other damages flowing from asymptomatic pleural thickening. Judge Del Sole also filed a concurring opinion in which Judge Ford Elliot joined. Judge Del Sole agreed that a person…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994 · in the opinion

    Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)

    …under N.Y.Labor Law § 200 to warn those lawfully on the premises of hidden dangers of which it knew or should have known. Gasperino v. Larsen Ford, Inc., 300 F.Supp. 1182 (S.D.N…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)

    …L. Martin, Gardner M. Duvall, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP, Baltimore \[Attorneys for Porter Hayden Company\]), all on brief. B. Ford Davis (Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P., Baltimore, all on brief), William D. Harvard, Warren N…

  16. Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · April 30, 1993 · in the opinion

    Hogland v. Celotex Corp. (1993)

    …Jr. of Crosby, Saad & Beebe, P.C., Birmingham, for appellee Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. Michael B. Kinnard and J. Ford Little of Baker, Worthington, Crossley, Stansberry & Woolf, Knoxville, TN, for appellees Keene Corp. and Owens-Illinois…

  17. Government report · 1997 · page 199

    Asbestos Bibliography (Revised) (1997)

    In the document: …K, Koskinen H, Vainio H, Niman H, Ford J [1992]. Serum oncoproteins and growth factors in asbestosis and silicosis patients. International Journal of Cancer 50(6):881-885. GRANT NO: K01-OH-OOG76 Broderick A, Fuortes…

  18. Government report · 1996 · page 219

    Work-Related Lung Disease Surveillance Report 1996

    In the document: …1.38 - - - - - - - - 1 1.38 Fayette - - - - - - 1 7.27 - - 1 7.27 Ford 1 5.86 - - - - - - - - 1 5.86 Franklin 2 3.90 152 162.55 2 3.90 - - 56 56.31 212 226.65 Fulton…

  19. Court case · U.S. Tax Court · April 28, 1997 · in the opinion

    Norwest Corp. v. Commissioner (1997)

    …of the asset on the purchase date. All remaining consideration, or residual consideration, must be allocated to class IV assets. See, e.g., East Ford, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-261. Petitioner did not…

  20. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 25, 1993 · in the opinion

    Dempsey v. Pacor, Inc. (1993)

    …Illinois, Inc., Celotex Corporation, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Keene Corporation, Nicolet, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Armstrong World Industries, Inc., GAF Corporation, Fibreboard Corporation, Southern Textile Corp., H.K. Porter Co. Inc…