No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

94 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 5

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · April 25, 1989 · in the opinion

    Anjeski v. Keene Bldg. & Development Co. (1989)

    …to a directed verdict because with the former the evidence has yet to be fully developed. See Pierce v. Ford Motor Company, 190 F.2d 910 (CA 4 1951); but see 10 Federal Practice and Procedure…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion

    White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

    …v. United Fruit Company, 365 U.S. 731, 81 S.Ct. 886, 6 L.Ed.2d 56 (1961); Sanderlin v. Old Dominion Stevedoring Corporation, 385 F.2d 79 (4th Cir. 1967); Ford Motor Company v. Wallenius…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · January 14, 1987 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …defendants should be \jointly and severally' liable." (Plaintiff's Complaint at pp. 7-8). A case decided in the Michigan Court of Appeals subsequent to Abel is Cousineau v. Ford Motor Company, 140 Mich.App. 19…

  4. Company document · Asbestos Information Association documents · February 12, 1981 · page 9

    Asbestos International Association Director General to Member Associations transmitting position paper 'Asbestos & Health in the Friction Material Industry' (1981)

    In the document: …ducts over the who Ddeceme airborme - estinated le Tange of US motor vehicl es at 5060 lbs. annually, 1 The Ford Motor Company carrie d out a study 26 based on dyn amoneter tests which showed…

  5. Company document · Asbestos Information Association documents · September 16, 1981 · page 3

    Asbestos Information Association/North America Sixth Industry-Government Conference Proceedings (1981)

    In the document: …Nicholas J. Hluchy}j, Esq. OMB AIA/NA Staff R, Ford Motor Company A. Husen Joseph C. Jackson Asbestos Cement Pipe Producers Assoc. The Bendix Corporation United States Congress Sandra Johnson W. Eugene Johnston Carol Jones…

  6. Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · October 15, 1986 · in the opinion

    Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)

    …his wife in his suit against the manufacturer. \[6\] In reaching this conclusion in Adams, we relied upon Williams v. Ford Motor Company, 342 A.2d 712, 718 (1975), a case involving the question of when…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 12, 1987 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …by demonstrating defendants' concerted activity, and proximate cause, by demonstrating that defendants' conduct "was so significant and important a cause that \[defendants\] should be legally responsible." Cousineau v. Ford Motor Company, 140 Mich.App. 19, 35…

  8. Government report · 1985 · page 491

    The Health Consequences of Smoking: Cancer and Chronic Lung Disease in the Workplace (1985)

    In the document: …Naditch 1984), the Live for Life program of Johnson and Johnson (Nathan 1984), and programs offered by IBM, the Campbell Soup Company, and the Ford Motor Company (Parkinson et al. 1982; Ware and Block 1982). Unfortunately…

  9. Company document · Union Carbide documents · September 16, 1981 · page 2

    Asbestos Information Association/North America, Proceedings of the Sixth Industry-Government Conference, Alexandria, Virginia (1981)

    In the document: …National Affairs, Dow Chemcial U.S.A. Inc. OMB AIA/NA Staff Ford Motor Company Husen Joseph C. Jackson Asbestos Cement Pipe Producers Assoc. Sandra The Bendix Corporation United States Congress Harvard University Calveras Asbestos, Ltd…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 30, 1982 · in the opinion

    Murphree v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1982)

    …Supreme Court, with Justice William Fones dissenting, prevented the amendment from becoming effective. The Court held in Ford Motor Company v. Moulton, 511 S.W.2d 690 (Tenn.1974) that under Tennessee vested rights doctrine, based…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 7, 1983 · in the opinion

    Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

    …Supreme Court, with Justice William Fones dissenting, prevented the amendment from becoming effective. The Court held in Ford Motor Company v. Moulton, 511 S.W.2d 690 (Tenn.1974) that under Tennessee vested rights doctrine, based…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 10, 1985 · in the opinion

    Kaminski v. Western MacArthur Co. (1985)

    …v. IRM Corporation (1985) 38 Cal.3d 454 \[213 Cal. Rptr. 213, 698 P.2d 116\]; Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256 \[37 Cal. Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168\]; Barth v…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · November 7, 1983 · in the opinion

    Donovan v. Oil, Chem., and Atom. Workers Intern. (1983)

    …Pierce Utilities Auth. v. FERC, 459 U.S. 1156, 103 S.Ct. 800, 74 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1983); Ford Motor Credit v. Milhollin, 444 U.S. 555, 556, 100 S.Ct. 790, 792, 63 L…

  14. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 1, 1988 · in the opinion

    H & H Plumbing Co. v. Indus. Comm'n (1988)

    …(1976), 39 Ill. App.3d 59, 65-66, 349 N.E.2d 616, 621; see Pearson v. Ford Motor Co. (1975), 32 Ill. App.3d 188, 191, 336 N.E. 2d 528, 530.) In the case…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 22, 1986 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1986)

    …722 F.2d 1238 (5th Cir.1984), modified and reh'g denied, 727 F.2d 350 (5th Cir.1984); Foster v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 1304, 1309 n. 10 (5th Cir.1980). We note…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion

    Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)

    …paying compensatory damages rather than changing the business practice which would result in extra costs. See, e.g., Wangen v. Ford Motor Co., 97 Wis.2d 260, 294 N.W.2d 437, 451-457 (1980); Sturm…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 21, 1985 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)

    …Inc., 656 F.2d 1147, 1153 (5th Cir.1981); King v. Ford Motor Co., 597 F.2d 436, 445 (5th Cir.1979). We find no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court. Nothing…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · April 8, 1981 · in the opinion

    Porter v. American Optical Corp. (1981)

    …75. See McCormack v. Noble Drilling Corp., 608 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1979); Stockstill v. Gypsum Transportation, 607 F.2d 1112 (5th Cir. 1979); King v. Ford Motor Co., 597 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.

  19. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982 · in the opinion

    Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)

    …as indicated by the recent single personal injury jury verdict in the amount of $127.8 million, of which $125 million was for punitive damages. (Richard Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., Superior Court, Santa Ana, Cal.…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

    …protection to a rigidly literal class of "users and consumers." In Ford Motor Co. v. Cockrell, 211 So.2d 833 (Miss.1968), a city employee noticed smoke rising from the motor of an unattended city truck…