No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Two Patterns for Bronchial from Inhaled Materials

Our plain-English summary of Two Patterns for Bronchial from Inhaled Materials, by K.H. Kilburn, A.R. Hudson, G.M. Halprin, et al (1974).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: K.H. Kilburn, A.R. Hudson, G.M. Halprin, W.N. McKenzie, J.A. Merchant
  • Published: Chest, Volume 65 No.4, April 1974.
  • Type of article: Conference paper
  • Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This conference paper reported short-term animal experiments on how inhaled materials affect the airways. It does not concern asbestos. Hamsters or guinea pigs were exposed in chambers to dusts, aerosols or gases and killed at 6, 12 and 24 hours. Controls breathed filtered air. Lung sections were examined for leukocytes (white blood cells) entering airway walls and for airway cell damage. In the results table, sulfur dioxide (40 ppm) alone and carbon (0.74 gm/M3) alone produced no leukocyte recruitment, but the two together did. Gossypol on quartz flour recruited leukocytes. Gossypol given as an aerosol damaged airway cells, as did paraquat at the higher dose tested on quartz flour (1 gm/100 gm). The authors reported that these materials recruited leukocytes when given at lower doses on particles. Except for nitrogen dioxide, the aerosols and the particles carrying adsorbed chemicals caused no recruitment or damage in the air sacs (alveoli). The authors called their conclusions tentative: airways, including small airways, react to airborne materials, and lowering the dose of a chemical on particles may shift its effect from cell damage to leukocyte recruitment.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Animal experiment: short-term chamber exposures. Animals were killed at 6, 12 and 24 hours and their lungs were examined by light and electron microscopy. Filtered-air controls were used.
  • Who was studied: Hamsters and guinea pigs. The article does not give the number of animals.
  • Exposure: No asbestos. Exposures included sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon, barium sulfate, silica (quartz flour), casein, gossypol and paraquat (as aerosols or on quartz flour), E. coli supernatant and endotoxin, and acid, alkaline and saline aerosols.
  • Main results:
    • Sulfur dioxide at 40 ppm alone and carbon at 0.74 gm/M3 alone each produced no leukocyte recruitment (scored 0).
    • Sulfur dioxide at 40 ppm combined with carbon at 0.74 gm/M3 produced leukocyte recruitment (scored ++).
    • Gossypol at 1 gm/100 gm on quartz flour produced leukocyte recruitment (++).
    • Gossypol as an aerosol (1 gm/100 ml) produced no recruitment (0) and was marked as damaging airway cells.
    • Paraquat at 1 gm/100 gm on quartz flour produced no recruitment (0) and was marked as damaging airway cells. The table entry for 0.1 gm/100 gm is illegible.
    • The authors reported that these same materials, given at lower doses on particles, recruited leukocytes.
    • E. coli supernatant and E. coli endotoxin produced recruitment (+). Casein dust did not (0).
    • The effects of the aerosols, and of particles with adsorbed materials, on the alveoli were negative: no cellular recruitment and no alveolar cell damage. Nitrogen dioxide was the exception.
    • Some other particles, even at high doses, recruited leukocytes without causing ultrastructural damage to cells.
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors called their conclusions tentative. They concluded that rodent alveoli are well protected from inhaled particles, that airways including small airways react to airborne aerosols, gases and particles, and that when particles are present, lowering the dose may change the effect from cell damage to leukocyte recruitment.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Alveoli.

Browse return to medical research.

How to cite it

Cite the study

K.H. Kilburn, A.R. Hudson, G.M. Halprin, W.N. McKenzie, J.A. Merchant. Two Patterns for Bronchial from Inhaled Materials. 1974.

Cite our summary

“Two Patterns for Bronchial from Inhaled Materials.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/two-patterns-for-bronchial-from-inhaled-materials.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.