The Value Of Lung Biopsy In The Diagnosis Of Occupational Pulmonary Diseases

Our plain-English summary of The Value Of Lung Biopsy In The Diagnosis Of Occupational Pulmonary Diseases, by H.S. Van Ordstrand, D.B. Effler, L.J. Mccormack, et al (1955).

The study

• Authors: H.S. Van Ordstrand, D.B. Effler, L.J. Mccormack, J.B. Hazard
• Published: Archives Of Industrial Health 12(1):26-32, July (1955)
• Type of article: Journal article
• Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library, J-M no. 001879. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This article, from the Cleveland Clinic, described the authors' surgical lung biopsy method and their experience using it over five years to diagnose suspected occupational lung diseases. The scanned text is badly damaged, and no mention of asbestos can be found in the readable part of this article. The authors noted that some lung conditions not caused by work can look like industrial lung disease on x-ray. They reported that in 11 patients the biopsy proved an occupational disease. Where a diagnosis had medicolegal implications, they held that it should be established beyond doubt by more than one kind of test, and these tests were positive in each case. Beryllium was given as an example of a suspected occupational cause. Case reports showed other diagnoses found by biopsy in patients with suspected work-related disease. These included the so-called Hamman-Rich syndrome and metastatic carcinoma in a 54-year-old man employed for 35 years in the glass industry. The authors concluded that surgical lung biopsy is indicated and usually can establish the diagnosis in these borderline cases. They noted that the procedure is not free of risk.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Description of a surgical lung biopsy method with a case series and case reports from one clinic
• Who was studied: Patients who had lung biopsy at the Cleveland Clinic over five years because of suspected lung disease; the total number is unreadable in the scan
• Exposure: Suspected occupational dust or chemical exposures, with beryllium given as an example and a case of employment in the glass industry; no mention of asbestos can be found in the readable part of this article
• Main results:
  • In 11 patients, lung biopsy proved a diagnosis of an occupational disease
  • Where the diagnosis had medicolegal implications, the authors held that it should be established beyond medicolegal doubt by histologic and other tests (part of the passage is unreadable); the tests were positive in each case
  • Biopsy also identified conditions other than occupational disease, including the so-called Hamman-Rich syndrome
  • A 54-year-old man employed for 35 years in the glass industry was shown to have metastatic carcinoma
• The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that surgical lung biopsy is indicated and usually can establish the diagnosis in borderline cases, noting that nonoccupational lung lesions can mimic those of industrial cause
• Limitations the authors state:
  • The authors stated that the biopsy method is by no means a harmless procedure

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Biopsy, Occupational Lung Disease, Occupational Disease, Carcinoma.

Browse return to medical research.