No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

The Pathology Of Pneumoconiosis

Our plain-English summary of The Pathology Of Pneumoconiosis, by O. Auerbach (1936).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Author: O. Auerbach
  • Published: Quarterly Bulletin Of Sea View Hospital 2(1):3-27, October (1936)
  • Type of article: Journal article
  • Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library, J-M no. 002942. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This 1936 article reviewed the pathology of pneumoconiosis, defined as widespread lung scarring (fibrosis) from habitually inhaling dust at work. It covered silicosis, silicosis with tuberculosis, asbestosis, siderosis (iron ore dust) and anthracosis (coal dust), mostly from others' work. The author added the author's own observations, mostly on silicosis with tuberculosis, without saying how many cases; one illustrated case was credited to Dr. Paul Slavin. The author disagreed that tuberculosis in silicotic lungs is fibrotic. The author's studies found it began in the air sacs and was mainly exudative, a cheese-like (caseous) pneumonic process. No asbestosis had been seen at autopsy at Sea View Hospital, so that section summarized others' reports. These described asbestosis in people who crushed crude asbestos, made asbestos mattresses, or carded and wove asbestos. It developed after four to thirteen years of exposure, although Wood observed two cases after four and fifteen months. Lung scarring was described as diffuse and at the lung bases, unlike the nodules of silicosis. Asbestosis bodies in sputum were said to show inhaled dust, not that scarring was present.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Narrative review of published literature on the pathology of pneumoconiosis, with some of the author's own observations, mainly on silico-tuberculosis
  • Who was studied: No defined study population. The author reported the author's own observations, mainly of silico-tuberculosis, but did not state how many cases were studied or where most of them came from. One illustrated silico-tuberculosis case was credited to Dr. Paul Slavin. The author stated that no case of asbestosis had been seen at autopsy at Sea View Hospital.
  • Exposure: Silica dust, iron ore dust, asbestos dust and coal dust. For asbestos, no fiber type is named. The jobs mentioned were handling and crushing crude asbestos, making asbestos mattresses, and carding and weaving fine asbestos. The author noted that more women than men were exposed in this work.
  • Main results:
    • In the author's own studies, tuberculosis in silicotic lungs was found to be predominantly exudative, a caseous pneumonic process, not fibrotic.
    • In silico-tuberculosis, the trabeculae that normally cross the walls of tuberculous cavities were absent.
    • The author had never observed silicotic nodules in the liver or spleen.
    • As reported by others, the exposure needed to develop asbestosis was shorter than for silicosis, ranging from four to thirteen years.
    • Wood was cited as observing two cases of asbestosis that developed after exposures of four and fifteen months respectively.
    • As summarized from Stewart's study, lung fibrosis in asbestosis was diffuse and peribronchial, located at the lung bases, in contrast to the nodular, upper-lung fibrosis of silicosis.
    • According to the cited authors, asbestosis bodies in sputum showed that asbestos dust had been inhaled and remained in the lung, not that fibrosis was present.
    • Tuberculosis as a complication was believed to occur much less often in asbestosis than in silicosis.
    • Lanza was cited as finding that in the United States the course of asbestosis was milder than English reports described.
  • The authors' conclusion: The article has no formal overall conclusion. The main conclusion that was the author's own was disagreement with the general opinion that tuberculosis in silicotic lungs is fibrotic in character. The author found it to be mainly exudative.
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The author noted that the early changes of silicosis had been observed in only a few cases.
    • The author stated that it is difficult to establish the length of exposure needed to develop silicosis, because most men had continued their occupation for many years.
    • The author had not seen any asbestosis case at autopsy at Sea View Hospital, so the asbestosis description relied on Stewart's study.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Pathology, Pneumoconiosis, Fibrosis, Silicosis, Anthracosis, Autopsy, Sputum.

Browse return to medical research.

How to cite it

Cite the study

O. Auerbach. The Pathology Of Pneumoconiosis. 1936.

Cite our summary

“The Pathology Of Pneumoconiosis.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/the-pathology-of-pneumoconiosis.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.