The Pathology Of Asbestos-Associated Diseases Of The Lungs And Pleural Cavities: Diagnostic Criteria And Proposed Grading Schema

Our plain-English summary of The Pathology Of Asbestos-Associated Diseases Of The Lungs And Pleural Cavities: Diagnostic Criteria And Proposed Grading Schema, by J.E. Craighead, J.L. Abraham, A. Churg, et al (1982).

The study

• Authors: J.E. Craighead, J.L. Abraham, A. Churg, F.H.Y. Green, J. Kleinerman, P.C. Pratt, T.A. Seemayer, V. Vallyathan, H. Weill
• Published: Archives Of Pathology And Laboratory Medicine 106(11):544-596, October 8 (1982)
• Type of article: Journal article
• Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library, J-M no. 000701. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This article was a report by a committee of North American pathologists, organized by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the College of American Pathologists, that set out diagnostic criteria for asbestos-related diseases of the lungs and pleura. It was not a study of a defined group of patients. It reviewed published work and pathological material from the United States and abroad, covering chrysotile, crocidolite, amosite and anthophyllite. The committee stated that the minimal features for diagnosing asbestosis were discrete foci of fibrosis in the walls of respiratory bronchioles together with accumulations of asbestos bodies. Asbestos bodies without fibrosis were not enough for the diagnosis. Fibrosis without asbestos bodies did not allow a definitive diagnosis, even with an exposure history. The authors noted that these early findings had not been shown to cause functional or radiological changes. They stated that all asbestos types can produce pulmonary fibrosis and that there was no evidence the lesions differ in appearance. They cautioned that much of the available material showed far-advanced disease and that exposure to a single fiber type was rarely documented. The grading schema named in the title does not appear in this text.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Committee report reviewing the pathology of asbestos-associated diseases and proposing diagnostic criteria; not a study of a defined patient group
• Who was studied: No defined study population; the committee reviewed collections of pathological material from the United States and abroad
• Exposure: Asbestos in general, with the commercial types chrysotile (serpentine) and the amphiboles crocidolite, amosite and anthophyllite; tremolite is mentioned as a contaminant of Canadian chrysotile
• Main results:
  • The committee stated that finding asbestos bodies without fibrosis is not enough evidence to diagnose asbestosis
  • The committee stated that a definitive diagnosis of asbestosis cannot be made when characteristic fibrosis is present without asbestos bodies, even in a patient with an exposure history
  • The authors noted that the early-stage findings that meet the diagnostic criteria had not been shown to cause functional or radiological changes
  • When only one asbestos body is found in a section, the committee required additional bodies to be shown before diagnosing asbestosis
  • The authors stated that all asbestos types can produce pulmonary fibrosis and that there was no evidence the lesions differ in appearance
  • The committee stated that measuring asbestos fibers in lung tissue does not replace careful microscopic study
  • Because the lesions of mild or moderate asbestosis are patchy, the committee strongly recommended open lung biopsy when a biopsy is needed
• The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that, in the present state of knowledge, the minimal features permitting a diagnosis of asbestosis are discrete foci of fibrosis in the walls of respiratory bronchioles associated with accumulations of asbestos bodies
• Limitations the authors state:
  • Much of the case material available showed severe, far-advanced disease, in which subtle differences between fiber types would be hard to see
  • Exposure to only one type of asbestos could rarely be documented with certainty
  • Little is known about the early lesion of asbestosis in humans, so its development had to be inferred from animal inhalation studies

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Pathology, Pleura, Chrysotile, Crocidolite, Amosite, Anthophyllite, Fibrosis, Asbestos Bodies.

Browse return to medical research.