No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Surface Interaction Studies

Our plain-English summary of Surface Interaction Studies, by J.H. Thomassin, J.C. Touray, P. Baillif, et al (1980).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: J.H. Thomassin, J.C. Touray, P. Baillif, M.C. Jaurand, L. Magne, J. Goni
  • Published: BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF MINERAL FIBRES (J.C. WAGNER, EDITOR), LYON: IARC SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS, VOLUME 30., PP 105-112 (1980)
  • Type of article: Conference paper
  • Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This was a laboratory study of chrysotile asbestos fibres. It did not study people or disease. The authors used X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, a method that measures the chemical make-up of a material's outer surface. First, chrysotile from Thetford, Canada, was soaked at 40°C in hydrochloric acid, oxalic acid, and several acids from the Krebs cycle (a chemical process in living cells). In dilute hydrochloric acid, the removal of magnesium levelled off between 4 and 25 hours, which the authors linked to the first mineral layer. The Krebs cycle acids were always less reactive than oxalic acid at the same concentration. Second, the authors measured how phospholipids (membrane fats) and red blood cell membranes stuck to the fibres. The phospholipid signal levelled off once the starting solution reached about 200 micrograms per millilitre. Assuming this meant full surface coverage, the authors calculated a value compatible with a double layer. Both proteins and phospholipids appeared to stick to the fibres. The authors concluded that it is difficult to relate these physical and chemical processes to explanations of cancer.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Laboratory (in vitro) physicochemical experiments using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy surface analysis
  • Who was studied: No human subjects. The dissolution tests used chrysotile fibres from Thetford (Canada). The adsorption tests used UICC chrysotile A with liposomes and human red blood cell membranes (ghosts).
  • Exposure: Chrysotile was soaked at 40°C in hydrochloric acid (6N and 10-2N), oxalic acid, and pyruvic, oxaloacetic, malic, succinic, lactic and citric acids (0.1 N). Chrysotile was also exposed to dipalmitoyl phosphatidyl choline liposomes and to red blood cell ghosts.
  • Main results:
    • In 10-2N hydrochloric acid, the dissolution curve was mostly a plateau from 4 to 25 hours. The authors linked this plateau to magnesium leaching from the first mineral layer.
    • The Krebs cycle acids varied in reactivity but were always less reactive than oxalic acid at the same concentration. The authors wrote that pyruvic and citric acids probably play some part in altering chrysotile.
    • The adsorption signal for dipalmitoyl phosphatidyl choline on chrysotile, plotted against the initial phospholipid concentration, reached a plateau at an initial concentration of about 200 ug/ml. A similar curve was obtained for ghosts.
    • The authors assumed that the plateau meant complete coverage of the chrysotile surface. On that assumption, the calculated area per phospholipid molecule was compatible with adsorption of a bilayer.
    • Photoelectron data for ghosts indicated that both proteins and phospholipids must be adsorbed onto chrysotile fibres.
    • In preliminary experiments, heavily magnesium-leached fibres carried a much lower surface concentration of phospholipid than unleached fibres.
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that unleached or first-layer-leached chrysotile surfaces are especially suitable for adsorbing proteins and phospholipids. They also stated that it is at present difficult to relate these physicochemical mechanisms to explanations of cancer.
  • Limitations the authors state:
    • The authors could not yet build a simple model to explain the ghost adsorption data.
    • The experiments on magnesium-leached fibres were described as preliminary.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Chrysotile.

Browse return to medical research.

How to cite it

Cite the study

J.H. Thomassin, J.C. Touray, P. Baillif, M.C. Jaurand, L. Magne, J. Goni. Surface Interaction Studies. 1980.

Cite our summary

“Surface Interaction Studies.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/surface-interaction-studies.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.