Our plain-English summary of Significance of Aspect Ratio in Regulation of Asbestos Fiber Exposure, by A. M. Langer (1979).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Author: A. M. Langer
- Published: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, pp. 601-603 (workshop introduction); ISSN 0077-8923/79/0330-0601 (1979)
- Type of article: Conference paper
- Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.
In plain English
This article is not a research study. It is the author's introduction to a workshop on aspect ratio in the regulation of asbestos fiber exposure. It reports no new measurements or health data. The author noted the contention, held by some investigators, that asbestos diseases are produced by a narrow range of particle types. The workshop also addressed elongated mineral particles from mining and milling nonasbestos ores such as taconite, talc and crushed stone. T. Zoltai and the author drafted recommendations after the meeting as what they believed was the participants' consensus. These called for standard mineralogical terminology. They advised caution with the word "asbestos": where a fiber's source is unknown or uncertain but its morphological, structural and chemical data match known asbestos minerals, investigators should call it indistinguishable from asbestos, noting that its absolute identity remains insecure. They also called for research linking fiber properties, such as number, dose, dimensions including length and diameter, persistence in the body and surface properties, with biological and medical studies. The available text breaks off in the middle of a fourth recommendation.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Introduction to a scientific workshop, with a summary of the participants' recommendations; not an original study
- Who was studied: No people or animals were studied; the article describes a workshop of scientists from different disciplines
- Exposure: Asbestos fibers and elongated mineral particles from mining and milling of nonasbestos ores (taconite, talc, crushed stone), including fibrous rock-forming silicates and asbestiform and nonasbestiform amphiboles
- Main results:
- Background premise: some investigators contend that asbestos diseases are produced by a narrow range of particle types
- The recommendations were drafted after the workshop by T. Zoltai and A. M. Langer as what they believed was the participants' consensus
- Recommendation 1: all agencies and individuals dealing with asbestos health hazards should use standard mineralogical terminology, citing US Bureau of Mines Information Circular No. 8751 (1977)
- In electron microscope studies, calling particles 'fibers' should not be taken as conclusive identification of an asbestiform habit
- Recommendation 2: when source materials are unknown or uncertain and the fibers' morphological, structural and chemical data are identical with known asbestos minerals, investigators should state that the fibers are indistinguishable from asbestos, with a caveat that absolute identity is still insecure
- The caveat attached to recommendation 2: absolute identity is still insecure
- Recommendation 3: future research should study fiber properties, including dimension (aspect ratio) with length and diameter, and should distinguish acicular cleavage fragments from asbestiform fibers
- Recommendation 4, cut off in the text, recommended abandoning the limitation of 'asbestos' to the minerals known to occur in commercial asbestos deposits; the rest of it is missing
- The authors' conclusion: The author wrote that the workshop's discussions served one of its goals, communication among scientists of different disciplines, and that the papers that follow illustrate the interdisciplinary approach needed for many of these problems
Topics
Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Aspect Ratio (Length-to-diameter ratio), Taconite, Talc, Asbestos.
Browse return to medical research.
How to cite it
Cite the study
A. M. Langer. Significance of Aspect Ratio in Regulation of Asbestos Fiber Exposure. 1979.
Cite our summary
“Significance of Aspect Ratio in Regulation of Asbestos Fiber Exposure.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/significance-of-aspect-ratio-in-regulation-of-asbestos-fiber-exposure.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.