Resolved - That The Government Shall Provide Compensations For All Occupational and Environmental Diseases

Our plain-English summary of Resolved - That The Government Shall Provide Compensations For All Occupational and Environmental Diseases, by K.H. Kilburn, D.M. Markuuson, R.E. Sweeney (1979).

The study

• Authors: K.H. Kilburn, D.M. Markuuson, R.E. Sweeney
• Published: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (1979)
• Type of article: Journal article
• Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This article was not a research study. It was the transcript of a debate on the resolution that the government should provide compensation for all occupational and environmental diseases, with K.H. Kilburn listed as moderator. Much of the scanned text could not be read. In the readable parts, Dennis Markusson, listed with the Johns-Manville Corporation, said the speakers agreed on preventing illness-causing exposure to carcinogens in the workplace. Markusson argued that Sweeney's remarks assumed industry was always at fault, and noted that plaintiffs and defendants had each won some lawsuits while little was resolved for the injured worker. Markusson suggested government should take part in a solution but was not sure more legislation was the answer. Robert Sweeney argued against adding to the size of government and said private insurers handled workmen's compensation claims better than public administrators. To close, Sweeney called for a minimum federal workmen's compensation standard, an end to statutes of limitations that deprive widows and injured workers of claims, and criminal procedures against responsible company officials.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Transcript of a moderated debate (not a research study; no data collected)
• Exposure: Not a study of an exposure. The debate concerned compensation for occupational disease, with the asbestos industry discussed.
• Main results:
  • Markusson said both speakers agreed on preventing illness-causing exposure to carcinogens in the workplace.
  • Markusson said plaintiffs and defendants had each won some lawsuits, with little resolved for the injured worker.
  • Markusson suggested government should take part in a solution if the present system had shortcomings, but was unsure more legislation was the answer.
  • Sweeney argued that the challenge was to reduce the size of government, and said the private insurance industry did a better job on workmen's compensation claims than public administrators.
  • Sweeney called for an end to statutes of limitations that deprive widows and injured workers of compensation claims, and for criminal rather than civil procedures against responsible officials.
• The authors' conclusion: No joint conclusion was reached. In closing, Sweeney proposed that all states have a minimum federal workmen's compensation standard.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Johns-Manville, Plaintiff, Defendant.

Browse return to medical research.