Practical Application of Magnetic Alignment of Mineral Fibres for Hazard Evaluation

Our plain-English summary of Practical Application of Magnetic Alignment of Mineral Fibres for Hazard Evaluation, by R.W. Gale, V. Timbrell (1980).

The study

• Authors: R.W. Gale, V. Timbrell
• Published: BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF MINERAL FIBRES (J.C. WAGNER, EDITOR), LYON: IARC SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS, VOLUME 30., PP 53-60 (1980)
• Type of article: Conference paper
• Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This paper described a laboratory instrument. It was not a study of people or disease. The authors, from Vickers Instruments and the MRC Pneumoconiosis Unit, described the Vickers M88 system, which counts asbestos fibres collected from air samples on membrane filters. The fibres are released into liquid in a magnetic field so that they line up. The instrument then measures the light they scatter as the slide rotates on a microscope stage. The scatter per fibre differs with asbestos type and dust source, so the machine must be calibrated against a manual count. Figures compared machine and manual counts for industrial amosite and industrial chrysotile filter samples, but the text gave no statistical measure of how well they agreed. The authors reported that a typical analysis took about 30 seconds and that up to 100 samples a day could be analysed, compared with 10-15 by manual counting. The filter area assessed was some 30 times larger than in manual counting. They noted that results below about 50 fibres per square millimetre of filter could be in error. The authors concluded the instrument was useful as a control tool, particularly for industrial atmospheres.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Description of a fibre-counting technique and instrument (the Vickers M88 rapid counting system), using magnetic alignment of fibres and light-scatter measurement; not a health study
• Who was studied: Membrane filter samples of airborne dust containing asbestos, including industrial amosite and industrial chrysotile samples shown in two figures; the number of samples is not given
• Exposure: Airborne asbestos fibres collected on membrane filters; amosite and chrysotile samples were used to compare machine and manual counts
• Main results:
  • Up to 100 samples per day could be analysed automatically, compared with 10-15 per day by manual counting
  • Typical automatic analysis time was about 30 seconds per sample
  • The membrane area over which fibres were assessed was some 30 times greater than in normal manual counting
  • Machine counts were plotted against manual counts for industrial amosite samples (machine calibration number 250) and industrial chrysotile samples (machine calibration number 300); the text gives no numerical measure of agreement
  • The useful range of the equipment was given as starting at 50 fibres per square millimetre of membrane (upper limit cut off in the text). The lower end corresponds to 0.1 fibres per ml of air for four-hour samples at 1 litre per minute on 25-mm filters. The authors compared this with the legal safe working limit for chrysotile at the time, 2 fibres per ml of air.
• The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that the instrument was useful as a control tool, particularly for industrial atmospheres, and that assessing a larger filter area gave a more representative result
• Limitations the authors state:
  • At fibre densities below about 50 per square millimetre of membrane filter, errors can arise because light scattered by the membrane or slide becomes significant
  • Because the method relies on consistent statistical distributions of fibre properties, it can lose statistical meaning when few fibres are present
  • The equipment must be calibrated against manual counts because fibre length and diameter vary with asbestos type and with the process producing the dust

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Pneumoconiosis, Amosite, Chrysotile.

Browse return to medical research.