No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Pathological Aspects Of Asbestosis

Our plain-English summary of Pathological Aspects Of Asbestosis, by D.O. Hourihane, W.T.E. Mccaughey (1966).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: D.O. Hourihane, W.T.E. Mccaughey
  • Published: Postgraduate Medical Journal 42(492):613-622, October (1966)
  • Type of article: Journal article
  • Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library, J-M no. 001502. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This 1966 article from Trinity College, Dublin, reviewed studies on the effects of asbestos exposure, focusing on the pathology of asbestosis. The authors' own experience rested on pathological material from 69 cases with clinical asbestosis at the London Hospital. It recounted that in 1930 Merewether and Price investigated 361 asbestos workers and concluded that inhaling asbestos caused a pneumoconiosis, a dust-related lung disease. The article noted that asbestos exposure had increasingly been associated with malignant disease of the lung and of the serosal membranes, the linings of body cavities. In asbestosis, it stated, thickening of the right heart ventricle was a common autopsy finding. It also discussed the asbestos body, a coated fiber seen in lung tissue. It cited experimental evidence from other researchers supporting the idea that fibers, rather than the bodies, cause the scarring. But it added that a suggestion that bodies may break into small particles that cause scarring should be kept in mind. The supplied text was badly damaged by scanning and stopped partway through, so the rest of the article could not be read.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: review of published studies on the pathology of asbestosis, drawing also on the authors' own pathological material
  • Who was studied: Published studies, plus pathological material from 69 cases found to have clinical asbestosis at the London Hospital
  • Exposure: Asbestos exposure in general. No specific fiber type is named in the readable text.
  • Main results:
    • The review recounted that Merewether and Price (1930), a different study, investigated 361 asbestos workers and concluded that asbestos inhalation produced a pneumoconiosis
    • The review stated that asbestos exposure had become increasingly apparent as associated with malignant disease in the lung and serosal membranes
    • In its description of the pathology of asbestosis, the article stated that right ventricular cardiac hypertrophy is a common finding at necropsy (autopsy)
    • The review cited experimental evidence from other researchers that supports the concept that fibers, and not asbestos bodies, are the agent that causes fibrosis
    • The review added that the suggestion of Knox and Beattie (1954) should be kept in mind. That suggestion was that asbestos bodies may fragment within the lung and that the resulting small particles may be the fibrogenic agent.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Asbestos Exposure, Pathology, Pneumoconiosis, Autopsy, Asbestos Bodies.

Browse return to medical research.

How to cite it

Cite the study

D.O. Hourihane, W.T.E. Mccaughey. Pathological Aspects Of Asbestosis. 1966.

Cite our summary

“Pathological Aspects Of Asbestosis.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/pathological-aspects-of-asbestosis.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.