Our plain-English summary of On the Milling and Ultrasonic Treatment of Fibres For Biological and Analytical Applications, by K.R. Spurny, H. Opiela, G. Weiss (1980).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: K.R. Spurny, H. Opiela, G. Weiss
- Published: BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF MINERAL FIBRES (J.C. WAGNER, EDITOR), LYON: IARC SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS, VOLUME 30, PP. 931-933 (1980)
- Type of article: Conference paper
- Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.
In plain English
This short laboratory report examined how two common ways of preparing fibres for biological experiments and analysis, milling (grinding) and low-energy ultrasonic treatment, change the fibres themselves. The authors used UICC reference standard asbestos samples and MN 100 glass fibres suspended in double-distilled water. They treated them in a laboratory cleaning bath at 50 kHz, at about 0.1 watt per millilitre, for periods from minutes to hours. Based on what the authors called limited measurements, long-term milling changed the size distribution, shape and crystal structure of asbestos fibres. Low-energy ultrasound had practically no influence on crystal structure. After several hours of ultrasound, fibre size and particle concentration changed in amphibole asbestos and glass fibres, and much more in chrysotile. In chrysotile, the results indicated breakup into thinner fibrils. Exposures shorter than 10 minutes showed practically no effect. The authors concluded that long-term milling procedures are not recommended as a way of reducing fibre size when preparing fibrous material for biological experiments. They judged that changes from short, low-energy ultrasound can be neglected in most practical cases of asbestos measurement.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: laboratory experiment on fibre preparation methods (milling and ultrasonic treatment)
- Who was studied: UICC reference standard asbestos samples and MN 100 glass fibres, suspended in double-distilled water; Fraunhofer-Institute of Toxicology and Aerosol Research, Schmallenberg, Federal Republic of Germany
- Exposure: long-term milling, and low-energy ultrasound from a laboratory cleaning bath at 50 kHz, at a power density of about 0.1 watt/ml, for some minutes to some hours; fibres included chrysotile, amphibole asbestos and glass fibres
- Main results:
- Long-term milling changed the size distribution and also the shape and crystal structure of asbestos fibres
- Low-energy ultrasonic treatment had practically no influence on the crystal structure of asbestos fibres
- After several hours of ultrasound, some changes in size and particle concentration were seen in amphibole asbestos and glass fibre samples; the changes were greater in chrysotile samples
- With ultrasound exposures shorter than 10 minutes, practically no effect was observed
- For chrysotile, aspect ratio (length to diameter) distributions before and after 3 hours of ultrasound at 50 kHz indicated breakup into thinner fibrils; the mean aspect ratio increased after treatment
- Short-term low-energy ultrasound produced changes in concentration and fibre size that were smaller than the statistical errors of fibre measurement in environmental and biological samples
- The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that long-term milling procedures are not recommended as comminution methods for preparing fibrous material for biological experiments. They believed that, in most practical cases of asbestos measurement, the changes from short-term low-energy ultrasound can be neglected.
- Limitations the authors state:
- The authors described their measurements as limited
Topics
Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: UICC, Crystal Structure, Ultrasound, Amphibole Asbestos, Chrysotile, Fibril.
Browse return to medical research.
How to cite it
Cite the study
K.R. Spurny, H. Opiela, G. Weiss. On the Milling and Ultrasonic Treatment of Fibres For Biological and Analytical Applications. 1980.
Cite our summary
“On the Milling and Ultrasonic Treatment of Fibres For Biological and Analytical Applications.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/on-the-milling-and-ultrasonic-treatment-of-fibres-for-biological-and.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.