Mesotheliomas in Relation to Exposure

Our plain-English summary of Mesotheliomas in Relation to Exposure, by F.D. Pooley (1972).

The study

• Author: F.D. Pooley
• Published: Biological Effects of Asbestos Lyon, October 2-5, 1972. Paper 34a.
• Type of article: Conference paper
• Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This conference paper reported an electron microscope examination of lung tissue from 120 cases of mesothelioma from Great Britain, Sweden, Holland and Canada. These were compared with lung tissue from 135 people without mesothelioma, obtained randomly at autopsy in Great Britain, Sweden and Holland. Cases were sorted into six exposure categories by the number of fibres counted per microscope specimen, and fibres were identified as amphibole or chrysotile. Only 18 of the 120 mesothelioma cases had asbestos bodies, and all bodies seen had formed on amphibole fibre. Over 92% of mesothelioma cases contained asbestos fibre and over 50% were above category 5. Among the non-mesothelioma cases, over 50% had no fibres found and over 90% were in category 5 or below. In the mesothelioma group, 16% had chrysotile above category 5 and 38% had amphibole above category 5. In the non-mesothelioma group, 3.0% had chrysotile above category 5. The author concluded that lung tissue from mesothelioma cases contained more asbestos fibre, mostly amphibole. The author noted that neither group was representative and the groups were not statistically controlled.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Electron microscope study of lung tissue comparing mesothelioma cases with non-mesothelioma cases obtained at autopsy (conference paper)
• Who was studied: 120 mesothelioma cases from Great Britain, Canada, Sweden and Holland; 135 non-mesothelioma cases obtained randomly at autopsy from Great Britain, Sweden and Holland
• Exposure: Asbestos fibres in lung tissue, identified by electron diffraction as amphibole or chrysotile, with cases grouped into 6 exposure categories by number of fibres per electron microscope specimen grid
• Main results:
  • In the mesothelioma group, 18 of 120 cases were positive for asbestos bodies on electron microscope examination
  • All asbestos bodies detected had formed on amphibole fibre. Amphibole was present in all 18 body-positive specimens and chrysotile was also seen in 8 of them
  • Among the 135 non-mesothelioma cases, over 50% had no fibres found and over 90% were in category 5 or below
  • Among the mesothelioma cases, over 92% were positive for asbestos and over 50% were above category 5
  • Chrysotile was the more prominent fibre type in the non-mesothelioma group and amphibole in the mesothelioma group
  • In the mesothelioma group, 16% of cases had chrysotile exposure above category 5 and 38% had amphibole exposure above category 5
  • In the non-mesothelioma group, 3.0% of cases had chrysotile exposure above category 5 (the amphibole figure is unreadable in the text)
• The authors' conclusion: The author concluded that lung tissue from mesothelioma cases contains larger numbers of asbestos fibres than non-mesothelioma tissue, that the predominant fibre in mesothelioma cases is amphibole, and that asbestos bodies are associated more closely with amphibole than chrysotile
• Limitations the authors state:
  • The mesothelioma cases were not representative of cases diagnosed in the four countries, and the non-mesothelioma cases were not representative of the general population
  • The results were not obtained from statistically controlled groups
  • The specific amphibole type could be identified only in cases in categories 1 and 2

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Mesothelioma, Autopsy, Amphibole Group, Chrysotile, Asbestos Bodies.

Browse return to medical research.