Meat Worker's Asthma

Our plain-English summary of Meat Worker's Asthma, by S.A. Levy, J. Storey, B.E. Phashko (1978).

The study

• Authors: S.A. Levy, J. Storey, B.E. Phashko
• Published: Journal of Occupational Medicine, Volume 20 No2. February 1978
• Type of article: Journal article
• Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This article is a case report about one 58-year-old male meat cutter. He was referred in October 1976 for wheezing that began at work in 1974 and never developed when he was away from work. He blamed fumes from heated price labels. His symptoms went away after a fan was placed near the price-labeling area and came back after the fan was removed during remodeling. Lung function tests showed a moderate obstructive impairment. In a laboratory challenge he breathed over heated price labels at 95°C. After four minutes he felt chest tightness and wheezing was heard. His forced vital capacity and flow rates then fell, and the fall partly reversed with isoproterenol. Analysis of the heated label emissions identified phthalic anhydride, 2.5-di-tert-amyl quinone and dicyclohexylphthalate. When he later inhaled a nebulized phthalic anhydride solution, he did not react. The authors took this as a sign that phthalic anhydride alone might not be responsible. They said another identified substance, or a combination of agents, might have been, and they called for further challenge studies. Asbestos appears in this article only as insulation on the laboratory heating chamber.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: case report with inhalation challenge testing and chemical analysis of heated price-label emissions
• Who was studied: one 58-year-old male meat cutter, referred in October 1976, who had worked as a meat cutter since 1937 and was symptom-free until 1974
• Exposure: emissions from heated price labels at work; in the laboratory, breathing over heated price labels at 95°C, and later a nebulized solution of phthalic anhydride
• Main results:
  • At work, his symptoms subsided after a fan was placed near the price-labeling area and recurred after the fan was removed
  • Baseline pulmonary function studies showed a moderate obstructive ventilatory impairment
  • After four minutes of breathing heated price-label emissions he experienced chest tightness, and wheezing was heard that had not been present before
  • Forced vital capacity and flow rates fell one and four minutes after the exposure ended; the fall was partially reversible with isoproterenol hydrochloride
  • Phthalic anhydride, 2.5-di-tert-amyl quinone and dicyclohexylphthalate were identified in the emissions from heated price labels
  • He did not react to an inhalation challenge with phthalic anhydride
• The authors' conclusion: The authors took the negative phthalic anhydride challenge as a sign that phthalic anhydride alone might not be responsible for the reaction. They wrote that another identified substance (2.5-di-tert-amyl quinone or dicyclohexylphthalate), or a combination of agents, might have been responsible, and they called for additional challenge studies. The responsible agent was left unresolved.
• Limitations the authors state:
  • The authors note that a challenge with heated phthalic anhydride crystals could have been performed but was not. They state that further challenge studies with heated phthalic anhydride and with the other identified agents are needed.

Browse return to medical research.