Our plain-English summary of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Analysis of 70 Cases in the Last Decade, by F. Garcia-Prieto, S.C. Pardo, M.T.R. Ramírez, et al (Open Respiratory Archives, 2024).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: F. Garcia-Prieto, S.C. Pardo, M.T.R. Ramírez, A.A. Fernández
- Journal: Open Respiratory Archives
- Published: 2024;6(2):100326
- Type of article: Case report
- Cited by: 1 article, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher · Free full text
In plain English
This scientific letter described all 70 patients diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma at Getafe University Hospital, Spain, from January 2008 to December 2021, using medical records. Fifty-three (76%) were men, and the mean age was 71 years. The authors reported an average annual incidence of 4.89 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Asbestos exposure was confirmed from medical history in 43 patients (61%). The letter did not name fiber types or jobs. The most common symptoms at diagnosis were shortness of breath (59%) and chest pain (53%), and 60 patients (86%) had pleural effusion (fluid around the lung). Median survival was 10 months overall. Among patients who underwent surgery it was 17 months, among those given chemotherapy 10 months, and among those given palliative care 3 months. By tissue type it was 12 months for epithelioid, 6 for sarcomatoid and 3 for mixed. The authors concluded that their area has a high incidence of this cancer linked to asbestos exposure, and that sarcomatoid and mixed types had worse prognoses. They named the single-center, retrospective design as limitations. Some figures differ between the text and the table.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: retrospective single-center descriptive case series, published as a scientific letter
- Who was studied: 70 patients diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma at Getafe University Hospital (Getafe, south Madrid, Spain) between January 2008 and December 2021; 53 (76%) men, mean age 71 years (SD 8.3)
- Exposure: asbestos exposure, confirmed from medical history in 43 of 70 cases (61%); no fiber types, products or jobs specified
- Main results:
- Average annual incidence of malignant pleural mesothelioma was 4.89 cases per 100,000 inhabitants
- Most frequent symptoms at diagnosis: dyspnea 41 (59%), chest pain 37 (53%), cough 26 (37%), weight loss 16 (23%)
- Pleural effusion was present in 60 patients (86%)
- Clinical stage: I in 36 (50%), II in 6 (9%), III in 11 (16%), IV in 18 (25%)
- Histological subtypes in the text: epithelioid 52 (73%), mixed 10 (14%), sarcomatoid 8 (13%). Table 1 gives slightly different counts.
- Treatments: carboplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy in 51 (73%), palliative treatment in 11 (16%), surgery (pleurectomy-decortication) in 8 (11%)
- Overall median survival was 10 months
- Median survival by treatment group: 17 months among patients who underwent surgical treatment, 10 months among those given chemotherapy, 3 months among those given palliative care. These are group figures, not a test of whether treatment caused the difference.
- Median survival by subtype: 12 months for epithelioid, 6 months for sarcomatoid, 3 months for mixed
- The authors reported that sarcomatoid and mixed types showed worse prognoses than epithelioid
- The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that their study shows a high incidence of malignant pleural mesothelioma linked to asbestos exposure
- Limitations the authors state:
- Single center and a specific population in south Madrid, a high-incidence area, which may limit generalizability
- Retrospective data from medical records may introduce biases and limit data quality control
- Clinical recommendations may have changed since the data were collected
Topics
Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Pleural Mesothelioma.
Related studies
- Serum mesothelin and other biomarkers: what have we learned in the last decade? — A. Cristaudo, A. Bonotti, et al. (2018)
- Three-Year Study of Markers of Oxidative Stress in Exhaled Breath Condensate in Workers Producing Nanocomposites, Extended by Plasma and Urine Analysis in Last Two Years — D. Pelclova, V. Zdimal, et al. (2020)
- Canadian chrysotile report released--at last — T.L. Ogden (2009)
- The incidence of mesothelioma has not decreased for the last twenty years in Southeast region of Anatolia — A.I. Carkanat, A. Abdurrahman, et al. (2011)
- Malignant mesothelioma: prognostic variables in a registry of 180 patients, the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital experience over two decades, 1965-1985 — K. Antman, R. Shemin, et al. (1988)
- Three decades of experience in the surgical multi-modality management of pleural mesothelioma — H. Luckraz, M. Rahman, et al. (2010)
Browse return to medical research.
How to cite it
Cite the study
F. Garcia-Prieto, S.C. Pardo, M.T.R. Ramírez, A.A. Fernández. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Analysis of 70 Cases in the Last Decade. Open Respiratory Archives 2024;6(2):100326. doi:10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100326. PMID: 38746541.
Cite our summary
“Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Analysis of 70 Cases in the Last Decade.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/malignant-pleural-mesothelioma-analysis-of-70-cases-in-the-last-decade.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.