Our plain-English summary of Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma diagnosed by EUS-guided tissue acquisition, by D. Mohri, Y. Nakai, H. Isayama, et al (Endoscopic Ultrasound, 2015).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: D. Mohri, Y. Nakai, H. Isayama, K. Koike
- Journal: Endoscopic Ultrasound
- Published: 2015;4(4):353-4
- Type of article: Letter
- Cited by: 4 articles, as counted by NIH iCite
- Read it: PubMed · Publisher · Free full text
In plain English
This letter to the editor described one patient, a 73-year-old man, whose recurrent malignant peritoneal mesothelioma was diagnosed using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue sampling. Five years earlier, during surgery for sigmoid colon cancer, a 17-mm nodule was removed from the omentum and diagnosed as malignant mesothelioma. The article stated that the patient had not been exposed to asbestos. Follow-up CT scans every 6 months showed no recurrence, until a CT showed a 3-cm, ill-defined soft tissue mass around the second portion of the duodenum. A PET scan showed uptake with a maximum SUV of 10.5. The duodenal lining looked normal on endoscopy, and a biopsy there was negative. EUS showed a mass infiltrating the liver and duodenum. Samples were taken through a 19-gauge needle, first with miniature biopsy forceps and then by fine-needle aspiration. They stained positive for calretinin and cytokeratin 5/6 and negative for CEA and CDX-2, which confirmed recurrent malignant mesothelioma. The authors concluded that EUS-guided tissue acquisition should be the first diagnostic procedure, rather than laparoscopy or laparotomy. As a single case, it cannot show how often the method succeeds.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: case report (letter to the editor)
- Who was studied: one 73-year-old man with a history of sigmoid colon cancer 5 years earlier
- Exposure: The article states the patient had not been exposed to asbestos. No fiber type or job is described.
- Main results:
- A 17-mm omental nodule was incidentally removed at the patient's earlier sigmoid colon surgery and diagnosed as malignant mesothelioma
- CT surveillance every 6 months after surgery showed no recurrence, until a CT showed a 3-cm, ill-defined soft tissue mass surrounding the second portion of the duodenum
- FDG-PET showed FDG accumulation with a maximum SUV of 10.5
- The duodenal mucosa appeared normal on endoscopy, and the biopsy was negative
- EUS showed a hypoechoic mass infiltrating both the liver and the duodenum
- Through-the-needle forceps biopsies were followed by a single-pass fine-needle aspiration
- The tissue stained positive for calretinin and cytokeratin 5/6 and negative for CEA and CDX-2, confirming recurrent malignant mesothelioma
- The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that EUS-guided tissue acquisition should be the first diagnostic procedure, rather than invasive procedures such as laparoscopy and/or laparotomy
Topics
Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Peritoneal Mesothelioma.
Related studies
- "Dry" pleural mesothelioma successfully diagnosed on endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) — F. Lococo, G. Rossi, et al. (2014)
- Malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration — B. Kang, M.A. Kim, et al. (2013)
- Pseudomesotheliomatous carcinoma of lung adenocarcinoma diagnosed using transesophageal ultrasound-guided bronchoscopic aspiration — T. Sumi, H. Nakata, et al. (2021)
- Cytopathologic Features of Metastatic Malignant Mesothelioma With SMARCB1 (INI-1) Deficient Diagnosed by Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Case Report — J. Yang, J. Liu, et al. (2026)
- Isolated pancreatic metastasis from a malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnosed using endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy — Y. Ishikawa-Kakiya, H. Maruyama, et al. (2022)
- Benign cystic peritoneal mesothelioma incorrectly diagnosed as an ovarian borderline mucinous tumor of intestinal type at transvaginal preoperative ultrasound evaluation — A.C. Testa, G.F. Zannoni, et al. (2011)
Browse return to medical research.
How to cite it
Cite the study
D. Mohri, Y. Nakai, H. Isayama, K. Koike. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma diagnosed by EUS-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopic Ultrasound 2015;4(4):353-4. doi:10.4103/2303-9027.170453. PMID: 26643708.
Cite our summary
“Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma diagnosed by EUS-guided tissue acquisition.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/malignant-peritoneal-mesothelioma-diagnosed-by-eus-guided-tissue.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.