Index-based FT-IR assessment of chrysotile detectability and environmental durability in asbestos cement materials

Our plain-English summary of Index-based FT-IR assessment of chrysotile detectability and environmental durability in asbestos cement materials, by G.Z. Macher, D. Beke, A. Torma (Scientific Reports, 2026).

The study

• Authors: G.Z. Macher, D. Beke, A. Torma
• Journal: Scientific Reports
• Published: 2026;16(1)
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

Abstract

Despite regulatory restrictions, asbestos cement materials remain widely employed among the population, thereby presenting significant environmental and health risks due to their chrysotile asbestos composition and vulnerability to weathering-induced deterioration. This paper explores the environmental durability of asbestos cement products and the detectability of chrysotile fibres using Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy, with a focus on an index-based evaluation. The analysis included both environmentally exposed and non-weathered reference samples, categorised into flat sheets, corrugated sheets, and pipes. Key performance indices were developed to assess spectrum matching accuracy, chrysotile fibre detectability, and durability under environmental stress. Results indicate that environmental exposure was associated with higher chrysotile detectability, likely due to surface degradation and increased dusting potential. These findings offer valuable insights for risk assessment and the development of improved monitoring strategies for asbestos-containing materials in various environments. The paper highlights the importance of comprehensive evaluations to understand the environmental behavior and risk profiles of asbestos cement products, which can inform appropriate management approaches for these materials in different applications and settings.

© 2026. The Author(s).

In plain English

This laboratory study tested a new way of scoring infrared (FT-IR) spectra of asbestos cement. The authors examined three product types: corrugated sheets, flat sheets and pipes. For each type there were five samples that had been in outdoor service for about 30 to 40 years and five reference samples of the same age that had been stored indoors and never weathered. Polished sections were scanned and matched against library spectra of chrysotile, and the authors built ten indices from the results. Weathered samples showed broadened, slightly shifted hydroxyl (OH) bands, which the authors read as structural disorder from long exposure. Two degradation indices (DII and EDI) were higher for weathered samples than for reference samples. Weathering was associated with higher chrysotile detectability, which the authors suggested may come from surface degradation and powdering. The actual index values were in tables missing from this text. The authors concluded the method is comparative and semi-quantitative. They noted a limited number of samples, a heterogeneous material and no calibration against reference standards. The study did not report measuring fibres released into air or water.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Laboratory analytical study. The authors used FT-IR spectroscopy in attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode on polished, epoxy-embedded sections, matched the spectra against chrysotile library spectra (statistics based on the top 10 matches) and developed ten indices to compare weathered with non-weathered asbestos cement. No measurement of airborne or waterborne fibre release and no health outcomes were reported.
• Who was studied: Asbestos cement samples in three categories: corrugated sheets, flat sheets and pipes. Each category had five environmentally exposed samples and five non-weathered reference samples (labelled, for example, AC-S-E-1 to AC-S-E-5 and AC-S-S-1 to AC-S-S-5). The article does not state where the samples came from.
• Exposure: Natural outdoor weathering of chrysotile-containing asbestos cement. The exposed roofing and piping materials had been in service for approximately 30 to 40 years outdoors, with temperature fluctuations, humidity, urban and industrial airborne pollutants, rain, freeze-thaw and ultraviolet radiation. The reference samples were of the same age, stored indoors and never exposed.
• Main results:
  • Characteristic chrysotile absorption bands were observed at approximately 3693 and 3648 cm-1 in the samples.
  • The exposed (weathered) samples showed broadened and slightly shifted OH bands, which the authors interpreted as partial dehydroxylation and structural disorder.
  • The degradation-related indices DII and EDI were higher for the exposed samples than for the non-weathered reference samples. The numerical index values are in Tables 1 and 2, whose contents are not in the provided text.
  • Environmental exposure was associated with higher detectability of chrysotile fibres.
  • The authors suggested that the higher detectability may be explained by surface degradation and powdering bringing fibres to or near the measured surface.
  • In an exploratory correlation matrix, the spectrum matching index (SMI) tended to decrease as the degradation-related indices increased. The detectability variation index (DVI) appeared less closely associated with the other indicators.
• The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that their index-based method allows a comparative and semi-quantitative evaluation of the environmental durability and detectability of asbestos fibres in cement-based materials. They stated it should not be regarded as fully quantitative without calibration and validation on larger datasets.
• Limitations the authors state:
  • The number of samples was limited, the asbestos-cement matrix was heterogeneous, and the FT-IR response may have been influenced by surface condition, spectral overlap and local variability.
  • The indices were not calibrated against external reference standards, so the approach is comparative and semi-quantitative rather than fully quantitative.
  • The correlation analysis used a limited number of aggregated group-level observations and should be interpreted with caution.
  • DVI is a directional variability indicator, not a strict statistical variance measure.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Chrysotile, Asbestos-Cement, Infrared Spectroscopy (IR), Environmental Exposure, Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM).

Related studies

• Impact of an asbestos cement factory on mesothelioma incidence: global assessment of effects of occupational, familial, and environmental exposure — C. Mensi, L. Riboldi, et al. (2015)
• Water quality index assessment of toxicity in direct and roofs runoff rainwater in industrial and remote areas of Eastern Nigeria — E.S. Nicholas, C.C. Okudo, et al. (2025)
• Development of a multidimensional housing and environmental quality index (HEQI): application to the American Housing Survey — M.T. Chu, A. Fenelon, et al. (2022)
• High levels of dioxin-like PCBs found in organic-farmed eggs caused by coating materials of asbestos-cement fiber plates: A case study — J. Winkler (2015)
• The impact of asbestos cement pollution in irrigation water on physiological and germination characteristics of Trifolium pratense, Medicago sativa, and Solanum lycopersicum seeds — G.Z. Macher, A. Torma, et al. (2025)
• Risk assessment of asbestos containing materials in a deteriorated dwelling area using four different methods — Y.L. Zhang, H.S. Byeon, et al. (2021)

Browse more research in Scientific Reports, or return to medical research.