Our plain-English summary of Identification of Single Asbestos Fires in Human Tissues, by A.M. Langer, F.D. Pooley (1973).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: A.M. Langer, F.D. Pooley
- Published: BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF ASBESTOS (J.C. WAGNER, EDITOR), LYON: IARC SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS, VOLUME 8, PP. 119-125 (1973)
- Type of article: Conference paper
- Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.
In plain English
This paper was a methods article, not a study of disease or of a group of people. The authors described how human tissue can be prepared, and which instruments can be used, to find and identify single asbestos fibres. They covered chrysotile and the amphiboles amosite, anthophyllite, crocidolite and tremolite. They described two ways to prepare tissue. One digests bulk lung tissue in potassium hydroxide, which can distort fibre sizes. The other is a carbon extraction technique for ordinary tissue sections. They reported that the light microscope was extremely limited for this work. With the transmission electron microscope, chrysotile could be readily told apart from all other asbestos types. The amphiboles looked alike, and their diffraction patterns showed only the mineral group, not the individual species. The authors described the electron microprobe, which measures chemical make-up, as at present the most reliable method for identifying amphibole fibres. It handled without difficulty only fibres thicker than 0.2 micrometres. The authors concluded that all asbestos fibre types may be differentiated and identified using morphological, structural and chemical data.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Methods paper reviewing tissue preparation techniques and instruments for identifying single asbestos fibres in human tissue, ending with a recommended analytical procedure
- Who was studied: No study population was enrolled; the methods concern human lung tissue. A figure showed electron microprobe analyses of asbestos bodies from people in the general population of New York City (50 analyses), from the lung of one Canadian asbestos worker exposed to chrysotile (12 analyses), and from a hamster lung (20 analyses). It also showed 77 uncoated fibres from workmen with known fibre exposure.
- Exposure: Asbestos fibre types: chrysotile and the amphiboles amosite, anthophyllite, crocidolite and tremolite
- Main results:
- The light microscope was described as extremely limited for identifying fibres in human tissue
- With transmission electron microscopy, chrysotile could be readily differentiated from all other asbestos fibre types by its shape and its characteristic electron diffraction pattern
- Amphibole fibres looked alike, and their diffraction patterns indicated only the mineral group, not the individual species
- The electron microprobe was described as at present the most reliable method for identifying amphibole fibres
- The microprobe analysed without difficulty only the largest fibres, those thicker than 0.2 micrometres
- Chrysotile loses magnesium in the body, so characteristic chemical analyses of chrysotile were rarely obtained with the probe
- In a figure, 50 analyses of asbestos bodies and their cores from people in the general population of New York City were consistent with magnesium-depleted chrysotile fibres coated with ferritin
- The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that all asbestos fibre types may be differentiated and identified on the basis of morphological, structural and chemical data
- Limitations the authors state:
- The bulk potassium hydroxide digestion method often produces an artificial fibre size pattern; for example, chrysotile fibres are readily broken down into fibrils
- Most asbestos exposures are mixed, which limits the value of identifying amphibole types by fibre shape and width
Topics
Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Chrysotile, Amphibole Group, Amosite, Anthophyllite, Crocidolite, Tremolite, Electron Microprobe Analysis.
Browse return to medical research.
How to cite it
Cite the study
A.M. Langer, F.D. Pooley. Identification of Single Asbestos Fires in Human Tissues. 1973.
Cite our summary
“Identification of Single Asbestos Fires in Human Tissues.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/identification-of-single-asbestos-fires-in-human-tissues.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.