No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Discussion Summary - Langer and Sebastien

Our plain-English summary of Discussion Summary - Langer and Sebastien, by A.M. Langer, P. Sebastien (1980).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: A.M. Langer, P. Sebastien
  • Published: BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF MINERAL FIBRES (J.C. WAGNER, EDITOR), LYON: IARC SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS, VOLUME 30., PP 143-145 (1980)
  • Type of article: Conference paper
  • Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This item was not a research study. It was a summary, written by A.M. Langer and P. Sebastien, of a discussion among participants at an IARC meeting on the biological effects of mineral fibres, and it reported no new data of its own. According to the summary, Gibbs suggested that fibres found in lung tissue were a 'survival population', because short fibres are preferentially removed and long fibres are preferentially retained. Gibbs also said that when M. Stanton's animal model was applied to fibre dimensions measured in mines and mills, crocidolite, amosite and chrysotile all showed an extremely high potential for mesothelioma production. Gibbs added that epidemiological studies have not shown equally high mesothelioma risks in workers for all fibre types, and suggested that dose, fibre retention, durability and surface properties may also play a part. Sébastien stressed the great difficulty of getting good size data for airborne chrysotile. Pézerat described work suggesting that aspect ratio predicted tumour production better than a single measure such as fibre length. Le Bouffant reported that heated chrysotile products kept their fibre shape and were being tested in animals. J.M.G. Davis proposed new fibre standards for experiments.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Summary of a scientific meeting discussion (not an original study); reports remarks made by several participants
  • Who was studied: No study population; the item records comments by meeting participants (Gibbs, Sébastien, Pooley, Pézerat, Le Bouffant, Elmes, Deruyttere, J.M.G. Davis, Peto)
  • Exposure: Asbestos fibre types discussed: chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite (airborne dust in mines and mills and fibres in lung tissue); chrysotile heated to 700 degrees C; 'mullite' fibres; asbestos fibres coated with asbestos-cement dust
  • Main results:
    • Gibbs suggested that the size distribution of fibres found in lung tissue represents a survival population, with short fibres preferentially removed and long fibres preferentially retained
    • Gibbs said that applying M. Stanton's animal model to fibre dimensions measured in mines and mills gave crocidolite, amosite and chrysotile all an extremely high potential for mesothelioma production
    • Gibbs observed that this did not appear to hold in workers, because epidemiological studies have not shown equally high mesothelioma risks for all fibre types
    • Gibbs suggested that factors beyond fibre dimensions, such as dose, fibre retention, durability or stability, and surface properties, may play a role in carcinogenesis
    • Sébastien emphasized great difficulties in obtaining good size-distribution data for chrysotile in air samples. Gibbs agreed with Pooley that some fibres in Gibbs' airborne measurements may be non-respirable, but said they are very few in number
    • Gibbs said that for chrysotile, curliness does not greatly influence cross-sectional diameter and therefore inhalation potential
    • Pézerat said that work in Pézerat's laboratory suggested that increase in aspect ratio was a more sensitive predictor of tumour production than a single parameter such as fibre length
    • Le Bouffant reported that chrysotile heated over a range of temperatures still retained fibre morphology, that intrapleural inoculation of these materials into animals was in progress, and that the 'mullite' question had not yet been addressed
    • In reply to Elmes, it was stated that it is unknown whether the calcium compound seen on fibres in asbestos-cement dust formed a continuous coating or adhering particles
    • J.M.G. Davis said that different asbestos fibre types had different stabilities in vivo, and suggested that a new set of fibre standards (short fibre, long fibre and mixtures) be attempted for experimental purposes

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: IARC, Crocidolite, Amosite, Chrysotile, Mesothelioma, Aspect Ratio (Length-to-diameter ratio).

Browse return to medical research.

How to cite it

Cite the study

A.M. Langer, P. Sebastien. Discussion Summary - Langer and Sebastien. 1980.

Cite our summary

“Discussion Summary - Langer and Sebastien.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/discussion-summary-langer-and-sebastien.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.