No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Byssinosis in a Nontextile Worker

Our plain-English summary of Byssinosis in a Nontextile Worker, by John D. Hamilton, Victor H. Germino Jr, James A. Merchant, et al (1973).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: John D. Hamilton, Victor H. Germino Jr, James A. Merchant, John C. Lumsden, Kaye H. Kilburn
  • Published: American Review of Respiratory Disease, Volume 107 (1973)
  • Type of article: Journal article
  • Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This article is a case report about byssinosis, a lung reaction to cotton dust. It does not concern asbestos. The authors studied one man who did not work in textiles: a 31-year-old pipe smoker with a history of childhood asthma and hay fever. His first brief visit to a cotton mill, in December 1968, caused no complaints. That mill had lower dust levels than the mill used later. During a later 45-minute visit to the other mill, his breathing worsened within 15 minutes. One legible passage reports his forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) falling from 3360 ml to 2200 ml. He then spent 4 hours beside operating carding machines on 4 consecutive days while his lung function and blood oxygen were measured. He developed shortness of breath, chest tightness and minimal cough. His temperature and white blood cell counts showed no significant change. On the second day, the change from baseline was 47 per cent for FEV1 and 25 per cent for arterial oxygen tension. His symptoms grew milder over the week, but similar lung function changes recurred each day. The authors concluded that a history of asthma may increase the likelihood of reacting to cotton dust and that prior sensitization is probably not essential.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: case report (one subject observed on repeated mill exposures)
  • Who was studied: one nontextile worker: a 31-year-old pipe-smoking man with a history of childhood asthma and hay fever, with no cotton mill exposure before December 1968
  • Exposure: cotton dust in cotton mills; the main experiment was 4 consecutive hours next to operating carding machines on 4 consecutive days (April 7 to 10). Earlier exposures were about 30 minutes in Mill A, which had lower total and respirable dust, and 45 minutes in the later mill
  • Main results:
    • the first brief exposure, in December 1968, produced no subjective complaints
    • respiratory symptoms and falls in FEV1 and arterial oxygen tension appeared within 15 minutes of entering the mill
    • on the 45-minute re-exposure, FEV1 fell from 3360 ml to 2200 ml (as printed in one of two OCR copies of the passage)
    • before exposure on the first day of the 4-day test, VC was 5200 ml and FEV1 was 3300 ml
    • the symptoms were shortness of breath with chest tightness and minimal cough
    • no significant changes in temperature, leukocyte count or eosinophil count were detected
    • on the second day, the per cent change from baseline in FEV1 was 47 per cent
    • on the second day, the per cent change from baseline in arterial oxygen tension (Pao2) was 25 per cent
    • symptoms were milder later in the week, although similar abnormalities of pulmonary function recurred
    • after a rest period, all measured parameters had returned to pre-exposure levels
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that a history of asthma may increase the likelihood of reaction to cotton dust, that prior sensitization to cotton dust is probably not essential, that no objective improvement occurred on successive days of exposure, and that very severe changes in pulmonary flow or arterial oxygenation may occur in a nontextile worker. They noted that he developed subjective but not objective tolerance. They suggested that a similar fall in oxygen in other reactors might reduce work capacity or induce angina or arrhythmias.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: FEV1, Carding.

Browse return to medical research.

How to cite it

Cite the study

John D. Hamilton, Victor H. Germino Jr, James A. Merchant, John C. Lumsden, Kaye H. Kilburn. Byssinosis in a Nontextile Worker. 1973.

Cite our summary

“Byssinosis in a Nontextile Worker.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/byssinosis-in-a-nontextile-worker.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.