No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

British Empire Cancer Campaign Effects of Asbestos Dust of Carbon Black

Our plain-English summary of British Empire Cancer Campaign Effects of Asbestos Dust of Carbon Black, by L.N. Pylev, G.P. Warwick, F.J.C. Roe, et al (1969).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Authors: L.N. Pylev, G.P. Warwick, F.J.C. Roe, K. Kanazawa, M.S.C. Birbeck, R.L. Carter
  • Published: British Empire Cancer Campaign for Research, published July 1969. Annual Report for 1968.
  • Type of article: Report
  • Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This is a short research report, with few methods details, printed in the British Empire Cancer Campaign for Research annual report for 1968. Hamsters received a single dose of radioactively labelled (tritiated) 3,4-benzopyrene, a cancer-causing chemical, placed directly into the windpipe. In some animals the benzopyrene was mixed with crocidolite asbestos fibres (1 mg) or with carbon black particles. The report does not say how many hamsters were used. When benzopyrene was given on its own, more than 90 per cent of the radioactivity left the lungs in the first 3 days, and about 0.1 per cent of the dose remained by the 21st day. With either dust, loss followed a similar pattern until the 14th day but was exceedingly slow afterwards. The authors reported that both dusts significantly increased retention in the lungs from the 21st day onwards. They suggested that benzopyrene and other tobacco-smoke carcinogens attaching to asbestos particles in the lungs may explain why asbestos workers are especially susceptible to the cancer-causing effect of smoking.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: animal experiment (brief research report)
  • Who was studied: hamsters (number not stated)
  • Exposure: single intratracheal instillation of tritiated 3,4-benzopyrene, given alone or mixed with crocidolite asbestos fibres (1 mg) or carbon black particles (amount unreadable in the scan)
  • Main results:
    • Benzopyrene given alone: radioactivity left the hamsters' lungs rapidly (more than 90 per cent) during the first 3 days and more slowly thereafter
    • Benzopyrene given alone: by the 21st day the radioactivity remaining was approximately 0.1 per cent of the administered dose
    • Benzopyrene mixed with crocidolite or carbon black: loss of radioactivity followed a similar pattern until the 14th day, then became exceedingly slow
    • Both crocidolite and carbon black significantly increased retention of radioactivity in the lungs from the 21st day onwards
  • The authors' conclusion: The authors suggested that adsorption of benzopyrene and other tobacco-smoke carcinogens onto asbestos particles resident in the lungs may explain asbestos workers' special susceptibility to the carcinogenic effect of smoking

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Crocidolite.

Browse return to medical research.

How to cite it

Cite the study

L.N. Pylev, G.P. Warwick, F.J.C. Roe, K. Kanazawa, M.S.C. Birbeck, R.L. Carter. British Empire Cancer Campaign Effects of Asbestos Dust of Carbon Black. 1969.

Cite our summary

“British Empire Cancer Campaign Effects of Asbestos Dust of Carbon Black.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/british-empire-cancer-campaign-effects-of-asbestos-dust-of-carbon.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.