Our plain-English summary of Asbestos--useful and dangerous, by G.W. Zeluff, D.E. Jenkins, S.D. Greenberg (Heart & Lung, 1976).
You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.
The study
- Authors: G.W. Zeluff, D.E. Jenkins, S.D. Greenberg
- Journal: Heart & Lung
- Published: 1976;5(3):482-4
- Type of article: Case report
- Read it: PubMed
In plain English
This article is a transcript of a grand rounds discussion at The Methodist Hospital, Houston. The authors described an ongoing study, carried out in East Texas, of sputum (coughed-up mucus) from former employees of an asbestos insulation plant that used amosite. So far, about 500 specimens from 236 former workers had been examined. Of the 236 workers, 54 per cent showed some degree of abnormal airway-lining cells (atypia): 48 per cent mild and 6 per cent severe. One worker (0.4 per cent) had cells of squamous cell carcinoma. Seventy-five of the 236 (32 per cent) had ferruginous bodies (coated asbestos fibers) in their sputum. None had been seen in about 5,000 routine sputum specimens a year over three years at a county hospital. The first worker found with cancer cells was a 77-year-old man with a 180 pack-year smoking history. One author stated that all the former workers who developed lung cancer had also smoked. That author viewed cigarettes as the prime carcinogen and asbestos as an accelerating factor. Another author said this does not hold for mesothelioma. The authors noted that it may take 15 to 20 years from the start of these airway-cell abnormalities to frank lung cancer.
We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.
What the study did and found
- Design: Grand rounds discussion (transcript) presenting preliminary results of an ongoing sputum cytology survey, plus one case description
- Who was studied: 236 former employees of an asbestos insulation plant, studied in East Texas; about 500 sputum specimens, half induced by saline aerosol and half spontaneous
- Exposure: Work at an asbestos insulation plant; amosite was the type of asbestos used in the plant
- Main results:
- Of the 500 total specimens, 26 per cent showed mild atypias
- Of the 236 former workers, 54 per cent had some degree of bronchial epithelial atypia, including 48 per cent with mild atypias (mild to moderate dysplasia)
- 6 per cent of the 236 workers had severe atypias (moderate to severe dysplasia)
- One worker (0.4 per cent of the 236) had cells of squamous cell carcinoma in the sputum
- 75 of the 236 former workers (32 per cent) had ferruginous bodies in their sputum
- Aerosol-induced sputum yielded about double the ferruginous bodies of spontaneous sputum
- In routine pulmonary cytopathology of about 5,000 sputa per year over three years at the Harris County Hospital District, not one ferruginous body had been seen
- The first worker with cancer cells was a 77-year-old man with a 180 pack-year smoking history. Bronchoscopy showed squamous carcinoma of the right main bronchus despite a negative chest x-ray
- The authors' conclusion: One author (Greenberg) stated that all the former asbestos workers who developed lung cancer also smoked. That author regarded the cigarette as the prime carcinogen and asbestos as an accelerating factor. Another author (Jenkins) said this smoking relationship does not hold for mesothelioma.
- Limitations the authors state:
- The authors noted that it may take 15 to 20 years from the start of bronchial epithelial atypia to frank lung cancer. For that reason, the peak of lung cancer in this group was not expected for another two decades.
Topics
The National Library of Medicine indexes this study under subjects our site covers: Asbestosis.
Related studies
- Genotoxicity of carbon nanofibers: are they potentially more or less dangerous than carbon nanotubes or asbestos? — E.R. Kisin, A.R. Murray, et al. (2011)
- Carbon Nanotubes: A Summary of Beneficial and Dangerous Aspects of an Increasingly Popular Group of Nanomaterials — C. Zhang, L. Wu, et al. (2021)
- Dangerous and cancer-causing properties of products and chemicals in the oil-refining and petrochemical industries. Part IX: Asbestos exposure and analysis of exposures — M.A. Mehlman (1991)
- Dangerous and cancer-causing properties of products and chemicals in the oil refining and petrochemical industry: Part V--Asbestos-caused cancers and exposure of workers in the oil refining industry — M.A. Mehlman (1991)
- Loss of BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) expression is useful in diagnostic cytopathology of malignant mesothelioma in effusions — I. Cozzi, F.A. Oprescu, et al. (2018)
- Immunohistochemical analysis of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UbcH10 in lung cancer: a useful tool for diagnosis and therapy — I. Perrotta, L. Bruno, et al. (2012)
Browse return to medical research.
How to cite it
Cite the study
G.W. Zeluff, D.E. Jenkins, S.D. Greenberg. Asbestos--useful and dangerous. Heart & Lung 1976;5(3):482-4. PMID: 1046057.
Cite our summary
“Asbestos--useful and dangerous.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/asbestos-useful-and-dangerous.
ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.
Talk with an asbestos lawyer
Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.
This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.