Asbestos Poverty as a New Paradigm for Multidimensional Urban Sustainability

Our plain-English summary of Asbestos Poverty as a New Paradigm for Multidimensional Urban Sustainability, by G.Z. Macher, D. Bódizs, D. Sipos, et al (Journal of Urban Health, 2026).

The study

• Authors: G.Z. Macher, D. Bódizs, D. Sipos, D. Schmeller
• Journal: Journal of Urban Health
• Published: 2026;103(1):214-228
• Read it: PubMed · Publisher · Free full text

Abstract

The popularity of asbestos-containing products stemmed from their fire resistance, thermal insulation properties, and mechanical strength. However, their well-documented adverse health effects led to the prohibition of their use in many countries. This research aims to conduct a comprehensive examination of the often-overlooked social dimensions associated with asbestos, with a specific focus on the affected population's circumstances and the potential solutions accessible to them. Its analysis encompasses legal regulations concerning asbestos, societal awareness, and the economic implications of asbestos removal from the perspective of those impacted. The findings highlight that the remediation of asbestos-containing products is often contingent on the financial and social conditions of the affected population, posing significant challenges for the economic sector and environmental protection efforts. This research contributes to the development of integrated approaches that address social, economic, and environmental dimensions in tandem. Its originality lies in situating the concepts of social sustainability and socially oriented environmental development within the context of asbestos-related policies. The findings suggest that achieving asbestos-free environments is feasible only through the integration of social dimensions, taking into account the economic and social conditions of the affected communities.

© 2026. The Author(s).

In plain English

This article proposed the idea of "asbestos poverty": being unable to remove asbestos-containing materials, such as aging asbestos-cement roofing, from one's living environment. The authors described three types: lack of information about the hazards, lack of access to removal and disposal services, and lack of money for removal and a new roof. They built an Asbestos Poverty Index that scored each type from 1 (very low deprivation) to 5 (very high deprivation) and combined the three using weights of 0.3, 0.3 and 0.4, with the largest weight on financial barriers. They applied it to five unnamed Hungarian municipalities, labelled C-1 to C-5. C-1 scored 1.00 and C-5 scored 5.00 on all three dimensions. The other three municipalities scored between 1.80 and 4.29. The article did not report any asbestos exposure measurements or disease rates. The authors concluded that the five municipalities differed markedly and that asbestos poverty comes from informational, institutional and financial factors together. They noted that a sample of five municipalities limits how far the results can be generalized.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

• Design: Conceptual paper with a composite index (mixed-methods approach) applied to five municipalities; no exposure measurements or health outcomes reported
• Who was studied: Five Hungarian municipalities, not named and designated C-1 to C-5; number of residents surveyed and study dates not reported
• Exposure: No asbestos exposure measurements reported. The study scored barriers (informational, service access, financial) to removing asbestos-containing materials, particularly asbestos-cement roofing, from homes; no fiber types or doses
• Main results:
  • Index method: each indicator was scaled from 1 (very low deprivation) to 5 (very high deprivation). The three dimensions were weighted 0.3 (informational), 0.3 (service access) and 0.4 (financial)
  • Informational deprivation scores: C-1 1.00, C-2 3.87, C-3 1.80, C-4 3.18, C-5 5.00
  • Service accessibility deprivation scores: C-1 1.00, C-2 3.55, C-3 2.12, C-4 4.29, C-5 5.00
  • Material (financial) deprivation scores: C-1 1.00 (minimum), C-3 2.22, C-4 2.80, C-5 5.00 (maximum)
  • Material (financial) deprivation score for C-2: 3.40
  • On the final index, C-1 had the lowest risk profile and C-5 the most severe; the final index values are shown only in figures, not in the text
• The authors' conclusion: The authors concluded that the five municipalities showed pronounced disparities in asbestos poverty, reflecting structural inequities in informational access, service availability and material capacity. They also concluded that asbestos poverty is shaped by informational, institutional and financial determinants together.
• Limitations the authors state:
  • The sample was limited to five municipalities, chosen where preliminary awareness or data availability allowed the method to be applied. This restricts the generalizability of the specific index values.

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Thermal System Insulation (TSI).

Related studies

• Development of a multidimensional housing and environmental quality index (HEQI): application to the American Housing Survey — M.T. Chu, A. Fenelon, et al. (2022)
• Human exposure to urban air pollution — C.E. Boström, J. Almén, et al. (1994)
• Identifying predictors of personal exposure to air temperature in peri-urban India — C. Milà, A. Curto, et al. (2020)
• Monitoring of airborne asbestos fibers in an urban ambient air of Shahryar City, Iran: levels, spatial distribution, seasonal variations, and health risk assessment — F. Taghizadeh, A.J. Jafari, et al. (2019)
• Topsoil and urban dust pollution and toxicity in Taranto (southern Italy) industrial area and in a residential district — M. Trifuoggi, G. Pagano, et al. (2018)
• Urban mesothelioma: is there an emerging risk of asbestos in place? — V. Ascoli, P. Comba, et al. (2004)

Browse return to medical research.