No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Annual Report of the Saranac Laboratory for the Study of Tuberculosis of the Edward L. Trudeau Foundation for the Year 1940

Our plain-English summary of Annual Report of the Saranac Laboratory for the Study of Tuberculosis of the Edward L. Trudeau Foundation for the Year 1940 (1941).

You don't need the product names or old records. No fee unless we recover compensation for your family.

Call 833-4-ASBESTOS Request a review

The study

  • Published: Saranac Laboratory for the Study of Tuberculosis, Edward L. Trudeau Foundation, Saranac Lake, N.Y. (1941)
  • Type of article: Report
  • Our copy: from Johns-Manville's own medical library. The article is still under copyright, so we describe it here rather than post it.

In plain English

This was the 1940 annual report of the Saranac Laboratory in Saranac Lake, New York, with a report by its director, Leroy U. Gardner, M.D., not a single study. It described animal experiments with silica (quartz) dust and diagnostic work, including 6814 examinations and 74 autopsies. On asbestos, the author wrote that a solubility study was beginning to explain why different animal species and organs responded differently. The author wrote that, except under very particular conditions, the fine fibres apparently did not keep the brittleness needed to act as a mechanical irritant to the human lung. A long series of experiments was expected to end the next year, but what they would show is cut off. The author also wrote that silicates, except asbestos, were probably of little or no hygienic importance. Animals breathing glass wool dust for over a year showed no serious lung effect, only slight chronic inflammation from fine non-fibrous debris made when the glass was broken up. The author wrote that the fibres' tendency, unlike asbestos, to form felt-like masses probably prevented their inhalation. Listed contributors included Johns-Manville Corporation.

We wrote this plain-English summary from the full article with the help of AI, and a second AI model checked each sentence against the article. It is not the authors' wording; the abstract and the article are their own account.

What the study did and found

  • Design: Institutional annual report (director's report describing ongoing laboratory research, including animal experiments, and diagnostic and autopsy services), not a single study
  • Who was studied: No single study population. The report describes ongoing experiments in rabbits, guinea pigs and albino rats, plus the laboratory's diagnostic work (6814 examinations) and 74 autopsies in Saranac Lake, New York, during 1940
  • Exposure: Quartz (free silica) dust in many of the experiments described. Also asbestos (a solubility study), glass wool dust (inhalation experiment) and iron dust (lymph drainage experiment)
  • Main results:
    • The author wrote that, except under very particular conditions, the fine fibres of asbestos apparently fail to maintain the brittleness that enables them to act as a mechanical irritant to the human lung
    • The author wrote that silicates, except in the case of asbestos, are probably of little or no hygienic importance
    • Animals exposed for over a year to as high a concentration of glass wool dust as could be maintained showed no serious effect on their lungs
    • In the glass wool experiment, slight amounts of chronic inflammation, similar to those seen with other harmless dusts, resulted from accumulated fine, non-fibrous particulate debris produced by the violent beating used to break up the material
    • The author contrasted glass fibres with asbestos: their tendency, unlike that of asbestos, to form felt-like masses was given as a probable reason they were not inhaled
    • In rabbits, the quartz in the lungs at death was proportional to the amount of silicosis
    • In guinea pigs, after two and one-half years of preliminary quartz exposure, the lymph nodes still contained one-eighth the amount of iron found in normal controls
    • The diagnostic department made 6814 examinations in 1940
  • The authors' conclusion: The author anticipated that a long series of experiments on asbestos would be concluded the following year. The sentence describing what they would demonstrate is cut off in the text

Topics

Medical terms in this study, explained in our Lexicon: Saranac Laboratory, Silicate, Chronic Inflammation, Johns-Manville.

Browse return to medical research.

How to cite it

Cite the study

Annual Report of the Saranac Laboratory for the Study of Tuberculosis of the Edward L. Trudeau Foundation for the Year 1940. 1941.

Cite our summary

“Annual Report of the Saranac Laboratory for the Study of Tuberculosis of the Edward L. Trudeau Foundation for the Year 1940.” AsbestosClaims.Law Library. https://asbestosclaims.law/library/research/annual-report-of-the-saranac-laboratory-for-the-study-of-tuberculosis-1941.

ACL Doc numbers and their short links never change. See how to cite the Library.

Talk with an asbestos lawyer

Start with what you remember, and we'll take it from there.

This page is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Every asbestos case turns on its own facts, exposure history, diagnosis, deadlines, available evidence, and applicable law. Reviewing this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, call 833-4-ASBESTOS for a free case review.